2010
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.4029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and physicochemical characterisation of starch from cocoyam (Colocasia esculenta) grown in Malawi

Abstract: The physicochemical properties of native Malawian cocoyam starches vary among the different accessions and differ from those of cassava and corn starches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
34
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
12
34
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Clarity of starch paste (0.5e4%) of C. esculenta was lower than that of cassava starch (Nwokocha et al, 2009), which agreed with another observation (Mweta et al, 2010). The difference in starch paste clarity could be due to the presence of granule remnants after pasting and the re-association of chains in the gel (Craig, Maningat, Seib, & Hoseney, 1989).…”
Section: Pastingsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Clarity of starch paste (0.5e4%) of C. esculenta was lower than that of cassava starch (Nwokocha et al, 2009), which agreed with another observation (Mweta et al, 2010). The difference in starch paste clarity could be due to the presence of granule remnants after pasting and the re-association of chains in the gel (Craig, Maningat, Seib, & Hoseney, 1989).…”
Section: Pastingsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Using HPSECevaporative light scattering detector (ELSD) with pullulans as standards, the number-average molecular weight of amyloses from 7 C. esculenta varieties ranged from 3.0 to 3.5 Â 10 5 , which is lower than that of cassava starch (Mweta, Labuschagne, Bonnet, Swarts, & Saka, 2010). The polydispersity indexes of these amyloses werẽ 1.2, similar to that of cassava (Mweta et al, 2010).…”
Section: Amylosementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The starch solubility of the buckwheat varieties, maize and potato were ranked in the order of Tartary buckwheat < common buckwheat < maize < potato. The differences between the starch solubility of the different buckwheat varieties, and the maize and potato starches were probably attributed to different their starch granule morphologies, which were affected by the amylose content and granule structures, and their starch granule sizes (Mweta, Labuschagne, Bonnet, Swarts, & Saka, 2010;Uarrota et al, 2013). Fig.…”
Section: Solubilitymentioning
confidence: 99%