2015
DOI: 10.2754/avb201584020097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and identification of Dichelobacter nodosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum using the polymerase chain reaction method in sheep with footrot

Abstract: Footrot is an important infectious disease of small ruminants leading to severe economical losses. The aim of the present study was to determine isolation and identification rates of Dichelobacter nodosus and Fusobacterium necrophorum in the culture techniques and reveal the specificity and sensitivity of the culture technique based on the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method in sheep with footrot. Dry swabs and swabs with Amies medium from 83 sheep were subjected to PCR and culture analyses. In dry swabs, 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In spite of this variety of geography, there are very few studies that isolate and identify the agent for ovine footrot due to the difficulty of culturing many of the microbes that cause foot diseases in cloven hoof animals (anaerobiosis, fragility, mixed infection etc.) [17] . Previous studies have been largely focused on the healing effects of different diagnosis and treatment options using clinical radiological imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of this variety of geography, there are very few studies that isolate and identify the agent for ovine footrot due to the difficulty of culturing many of the microbes that cause foot diseases in cloven hoof animals (anaerobiosis, fragility, mixed infection etc.) [17] . Previous studies have been largely focused on the healing effects of different diagnosis and treatment options using clinical radiological imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1989; Sağlıyan ve ark. 2008;Özgen ve ark. 2015).İzci (1994), yaptığı çalışmada ağıl dönemi sonunda piyeten oranını %0.14, mera dönemi sonunda ise %0.64 olarak saptamıştır.Yıldız ve Gençcelep (2021), Muş ve yöresinde yaptıkları çalışmada piyeten insidansını %9.14 olarak belirlemiştir.…”
unclassified