2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Isolation and gut microbiota modulation of antibiotic-resistant probiotics from human feces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A multitude of extrinsic factors could be listed that can have a major influence on changes in the intestinal microbiota but one of the most important etiological factors involved is the use of antibiotics, with important changes in intestinal microbiota seen following their use [26,27]. Several studies have explored this field in both animals and humans, concurring on changes in the intestinal microbiota over a period of time, with their subsequent re-establishment [27,28], while others have described persistent effects with a long-term impact on the microbiota, where recovery may sometimes be incomplete [29,30,31], causing rapid and significant reductions in taxonomic richness, diversity, and uniformity [29,32]. In agreement with the literature [26,31,33,34], we observed early secondary changes in biodiversity after conventional antibiotic therapy [32,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A multitude of extrinsic factors could be listed that can have a major influence on changes in the intestinal microbiota but one of the most important etiological factors involved is the use of antibiotics, with important changes in intestinal microbiota seen following their use [26,27]. Several studies have explored this field in both animals and humans, concurring on changes in the intestinal microbiota over a period of time, with their subsequent re-establishment [27,28], while others have described persistent effects with a long-term impact on the microbiota, where recovery may sometimes be incomplete [29,30,31], causing rapid and significant reductions in taxonomic richness, diversity, and uniformity [29,32]. In agreement with the literature [26,31,33,34], we observed early secondary changes in biodiversity after conventional antibiotic therapy [32,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conflicting positions have been taken regarding the benefits versus risk of inclusion of antibiotic‐resistant bacterial strains in probiotics . Antibiotic‐resistant bacteria might improve protection against AAGS, but they also could serve as a source of antibiotic‐resistant genes for normal flora . As a result, the use of resistant strains in probiotics generally is discouraged, and it is explicitly banned by the European Food Safety Authority .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AAD model was induced by gavage daily with 2 ml of normal saline containing a mixture of clindamycin (Hisoar Pharmaceutical, Zhejiang, China), ampicillin (Jianmin Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, China), and streptomycin (Lukang Pharmaceutical Co., Shandong, China) at various doses: low dose (combination of 25 mg/ml clindamycin, 27.75 mg/ml ampicillin, and 13.88 mg/ml streptomycin); middle dose (combination of 50 mg/ml clindamycin, 55.5 mg/ml ampicillin, and 27.75 mg/ml streptomycin); high dose (combination of 75 mg/ml clindamycin, 83.25 mg/ml ampicillin, and 41.63 mg/ml streptomycin). The antibiotics were gavaged for 7 days, and the doses were determined to be 1.35, 2.70, and 4.05 times the maximum human equivalent dose, respectively, based on previous studies ( 20 , 21 ). Weight, water intake, and the presence of diarrhea were measured every second day during the experimental period.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%