2004
|
Sign up to set email alerts
Isolated Relative Afferent Pupillary Defect Secondary to Contralateral Midbrain Compression
Search citation statements
Order By: Relevance
Paper Sections
Select...
8
3
0
0
Citation Types
1
2
0
0
Year Published
Range
2006
20062019
2019Publication Types
Select...
8
3
Relationship
0
11
Authors
Journals
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
References 4 publications
1
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This assumption is strengthened by several cases of a RAPD with normal visual function in lesions close to the LGN or pretectal region as well as by reports of optic tract lesions without a RAPD. 4,28,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The present findings also support the concept of cortical input into the PLR (figure 3), which may enter the PLR pathway via the area depicted in figures 1B and 2. Therefore, disturbed processing of signals along this part of the geniculostriate pathway can lead to a RAPD.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This assumption is strengthened by several cases of a RAPD with normal visual function in lesions close to the LGN or pretectal region as well as by reports of optic tract lesions without a RAPD. 4,28,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The present findings also support the concept of cortical input into the PLR (figure 3), which may enter the PLR pathway via the area depicted in figures 1B and 2. Therefore, disturbed processing of signals along this part of the geniculostriate pathway can lead to a RAPD.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, we cannot exclude the possibility that focal chorioretinitis, which we have observed in the majority of our optic neuritis patients, resulted in the primary rod damage and impairment of retinal electrical activity and night vision. Many optic neuritis patients may have inflammatory brain component affecting predominantly the white matter, so it is possible that observed lack of the PLR and dazzle reflex may be a result of the damage to subcortical mid‐brain centers and/or their efferent radiations, which could potentially contribute to the absence of these reflex responses 36–39 …”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Quantification of an RAPD as >0.3 log is therefore important to demonstrate that an RAPD is pathologic, especially in the absence of visual impairment. Eight such cases have been published between 1984 and 2004 [4], only three of which included explicit quantification of the RAPD [5,6,8]. All eight cases were caused by a tumour or haemorrhage in the dorsal midbrain.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This assumption is strengthened by several cases of a RAPD with normal visual function in lesions close to the LGN or pretectal region as well as by reports of optic tract lesions without a RAPD. 4,28,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The present findings also support the concept of cortical input into the PLR (figure 3), which may enter the PLR pathway via the area depicted in figures 1B and 2. Therefore, disturbed processing of signals along this part of the geniculostriate pathway can lead to a RAPD.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, we cannot exclude the possibility that focal chorioretinitis, which we have observed in the majority of our optic neuritis patients, resulted in the primary rod damage and impairment of retinal electrical activity and night vision. Many optic neuritis patients may have inflammatory brain component affecting predominantly the white matter, so it is possible that observed lack of the PLR and dazzle reflex may be a result of the damage to subcortical mid‐brain centers and/or their efferent radiations, which could potentially contribute to the absence of these reflex responses 36–39 …”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Quantification of an RAPD as >0.3 log is therefore important to demonstrate that an RAPD is pathologic, especially in the absence of visual impairment. Eight such cases have been published between 1984 and 2004 [4], only three of which included explicit quantification of the RAPD [5,6,8]. All eight cases were caused by a tumour or haemorrhage in the dorsal midbrain.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…This assumption is strengthened by several cases of a RAPD with normal visual function in lesions close to the LGN or pretectal region as well as by reports of optic tract lesions without a RAPD. 4,28,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] The present findings also support the concept of cortical input into the PLR (figure 3), which may enter the PLR pathway via the area depicted in figures 1B and 2. Therefore, disturbed processing of signals along this part of the geniculostriate pathway can lead to a RAPD.…”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 86%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…However, we cannot exclude the possibility that focal chorioretinitis, which we have observed in the majority of our optic neuritis patients, resulted in the primary rod damage and impairment of retinal electrical activity and night vision. Many optic neuritis patients may have inflammatory brain component affecting predominantly the white matter, so it is possible that observed lack of the PLR and dazzle reflex may be a result of the damage to subcortical mid‐brain centers and/or their efferent radiations, which could potentially contribute to the absence of these reflex responses 36–39 …”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Quantification of an RAPD as >0.3 log is therefore important to demonstrate that an RAPD is pathologic, especially in the absence of visual impairment. Eight such cases have been published between 1984 and 2004 [4], only three of which included explicit quantification of the RAPD [5,6,8]. All eight cases were caused by a tumour or haemorrhage in the dorsal midbrain.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%