2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there association between cutting and jump-landing movement quality in semi-professional football players? Implications for ACL injury risk screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CMAS scores are associated with peak external knee abduction moment as well as greater knee joint loading ( 63 ). Similar to findings in laboratory-based settings, CMAS and LESS scores do not associate with each other ( 64 ), suggesting that both should be included in RTS batteries as they capture different constructs.…”
Section: Current Functional Performance Testingsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…CMAS scores are associated with peak external knee abduction moment as well as greater knee joint loading ( 63 ). Similar to findings in laboratory-based settings, CMAS and LESS scores do not associate with each other ( 64 ), suggesting that both should be included in RTS batteries as they capture different constructs.…”
Section: Current Functional Performance Testingsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Therefore, intra- and inter-rater reliability were assessed to check for ratings’ credibility. Decent intra- ( ICC = 0.91–0.99) and inter-rater ( ICC = 0.71) reliability were achieved, with ICC s comparable to ( ICC = 0.95 and ICC = 0.69, respectively) [ 75 ] or exceeding ( ICC = 0.70 and ICC = 0.58, respectively) [ 77 ] those observed in other studies. As a side note, the within-session reliability of the CMASs was comparable to those observed in other studies [ 60 , 120 , 151 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Jump-landing tasks were the most popular dynamic motion among included studies and have been established as being well suited for identifying athletes at greater risk of ACL injury 7 . Cutting motions were less popular, but could be complementary to jump-landing tasks because knee kinematics and kinetics were significantly different during these two motions when assess in-lab 11 , 89 . Thus, simultaneous evaluation of jump-landing and cutting movement quality would provide a broader array of real-world conditions for more reliable injury risk screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%