2017
DOI: 10.1186/s13098-017-0204-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a justification for classifying GLP-1 receptor agonists as basal and prandial?

Abstract: Several GLP-1 receptor agonists are currently available for treatment of type 2 diabetic patients. Based on their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, these drugs are classified as short-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide and lixisenatide) or long-acting GLP-1 receptor agonists (exenatide-LAR, liraglutide, albiglutide, and dulaglutide). In clinical practice, they are also classified as basal or prandial GLP-1 receptor agonists to differentiate between patients who would benefit more from one or anot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Classification of GLP-1 RAs as either basal or prandial specific solely based on duration of action is not justifiable, and could be clinically misleading. 15 The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the change in relative contributions of BHG and PPHG to overall hyperglycaemia across different HbA1c categories at baseline and after 6 months of treatment intensification with dulaglutide 1.5 mg as monotherapy or with oral glucose-lowering agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. As an exploratory objective, we aimed to evaluate any differences between dulaglutide and liraglutide, exenatide BID or insulin glargine on the impact on relative contribution of BHG and PPHG to overall hyperglycaemia after 6 months of treatment intensification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classification of GLP-1 RAs as either basal or prandial specific solely based on duration of action is not justifiable, and could be clinically misleading. 15 The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the change in relative contributions of BHG and PPHG to overall hyperglycaemia across different HbA1c categories at baseline and after 6 months of treatment intensification with dulaglutide 1.5 mg as monotherapy or with oral glucose-lowering agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. As an exploratory objective, we aimed to evaluate any differences between dulaglutide and liraglutide, exenatide BID or insulin glargine on the impact on relative contribution of BHG and PPHG to overall hyperglycaemia after 6 months of treatment intensification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the change in relative contributions of BHG and PPHG to overall hyperglycaemia across different HbA1c categories at baseline and after 6 months of treatment intensification with dulaglutide 1.5 mg as monotherapy or with oral glucose-lowering agents in patients with type 2 diabetes. 15 The purpose of this post hoc analysis was to evaluate the change in relative contributions of BHG and PPHG to overall hyperglycaemia across different HbA1c categories at baseline and after 6 months of treatment intensification with dulaglutide 1.5 mg as monotherapy or with oral glucose-lowering agents in patients with type 2 diabetes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we compare this data with the data of the various AWARD trials some stark differences do stand out all of which can perhaps be explained and some of which can be expected as a part of standard differences which occur in between RCTs and RWE (real world evidence) generated data. Dulaglutide being an once weekly GLP-1RAs is structurally a large molecule and is expected to have a more profound action over fasting plasma glucose rather than on the post prandial plasma glucose levels [11], however in this real world generated data the same was not reflected due to the heterogeneity of concomitant anti diabetic medication which perhaps played a differential role in the control of fasting and post prandial blood glucose levels. AWARD 3 assessed dulaglutide monotherapy at 1.5 gm dose over a 52 week period and achieved an HbA1C reduction of 0.78 ± 0.06 % and this data from the series of AWARD studies was less than the HbA1c reduction achieved in the subset of patients which we included in our study cohort [12].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Megengedett volt az adott kezelés mellett legfeljebb egy orális vércukorcsökkentő -metformin, sulfanylurea-típusú szer a glibenclamid kivételével, meglitinidszármazék, acarbose, dipeptidilpeptidáz-4-gátló -kiegészítő adása is. A négy csoportba egyenként 40, öszszesen 160 személyt vontak be, akiken hatnapos CGMS-sel 7,8,11 LixiLan-O LixiLan-L…”
Section: A Bázisinzulin-glp-1-ra Kombináció Elméleti Háttereunclassified