2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2006.00352.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is there a correlation between vaginal chlamydia infection and cervical smear abnormalities? A community‐based study in the Al‐Ain district, United Arab Emirates

Abstract: Although there have been earlier reports of an association between vaginal chlamydia and cervical abnormalities, our study does not provide evidence to support this association.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…11 Compared with antigen-based C. trachomatis prevalence, the observed 22.0% seroprevalence is 9 times higher than that reported in female patients attending primary and secondary care in UAE. 12 Compared with the nucleic acid amplification test-based prevalence, the overall C. trachomatis seroprevalence (22.0%) in this study is 4.9, 5.8, and 27.5 times higher than that estimated in general populations in the region of America (4.5%), in the region of Africa (3.8%), and in the region of Southeast Asia (0.8%), respectively. 18 This noticeable high burden of C. trachomatis suggests a substantial infection in this vulnerable population and adds to the totality of evidence on the potential impact of C. trachomatis on fertility.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…11 Compared with antigen-based C. trachomatis prevalence, the observed 22.0% seroprevalence is 9 times higher than that reported in female patients attending primary and secondary care in UAE. 12 Compared with the nucleic acid amplification test-based prevalence, the overall C. trachomatis seroprevalence (22.0%) in this study is 4.9, 5.8, and 27.5 times higher than that estimated in general populations in the region of America (4.5%), in the region of Africa (3.8%), and in the region of Southeast Asia (0.8%), respectively. 18 This noticeable high burden of C. trachomatis suggests a substantial infection in this vulnerable population and adds to the totality of evidence on the potential impact of C. trachomatis on fertility.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 70%
“…The prevalence of C. trachomatis IgG (19.0%) is comparable to that estimated in infertility clinic attendees (21.5%; 95% CI, 16.3–27.2) in the MENA region 11 . Compared with antigen-based C. trachomatis prevalence, the observed 22.0% seroprevalence is 9 times higher than that reported in female patients attending primary and secondary care in UAE 12 . Compared with the nucleic acid amplification test–based prevalence, the overall C. trachomatis seroprevalence (22.0%) in this study is 4.9, 5.8, and 27.5 times higher than that estimated in general populations in the region of America (4.5%), in the region of Africa (3.8%), and in the region of Southeast Asia (0.8%), respectively 18 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 2 more Smart Citations