Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
15
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
2
15
2
Order By: Relevance
“…When patients were stratified by CT-derived muscularity, the only difference in functional performance observed here was reduced chest press strength in cancer patients with low SMI compared to cancer patients with normal SMI. In contrast to Barbalho and colleagues, we did not observe a difference in HGS across groups based on SMI stratification [23]. Considering that the current cohort displayed roughly twice the HGS as the Barbalho et al male cohort, the discrepancy may be because most of that cohort were undergoing chemotherapy and/ or radiotherapy at the time of functional assessment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When patients were stratified by CT-derived muscularity, the only difference in functional performance observed here was reduced chest press strength in cancer patients with low SMI compared to cancer patients with normal SMI. In contrast to Barbalho and colleagues, we did not observe a difference in HGS across groups based on SMI stratification [23]. Considering that the current cohort displayed roughly twice the HGS as the Barbalho et al male cohort, the discrepancy may be because most of that cohort were undergoing chemotherapy and/ or radiotherapy at the time of functional assessment.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…While the difference in number of patients with low SMI across groups in the current study did not reach significance, this number was over twice as high in cancer patients with cachexia (57%) than cancer patients without cachexia (28%). Using the same SMI cut-point, low SMI was reportedly 21.6% in a cohort of male patients with GI cancer, similar to that observed here for cancer patients without cachexia [23]. However, 24% of that cohort met the weight loss criteria for cachexia, indicating that their reported prevalence of low SMI is likely lower than in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The advent of CT also enables explorations of changes in muscle fat avoiding invasive muscle biopsy [14]. Low muscle attenuation (MA), at the level of L3, has been reported as a poor prognostic factor for survival [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%