2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2022.07.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is it safe? Exploring positive and negative outcome changes following a web-based intervention for adolescents distressed by a visible difference (YP Face IT)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other participants (adolescents and parents) felt that YPF did not meet their needs because the adolescent had lower levels of appearance-related concerns and perceived their visible difference to be less noticeable and stigmatising than examples provided within YPF. These findings, which align with previous qualitative 20 and quantitative findings, 22 , 23 reaffirm the value of obtaining subjective assessments of appearance concerns rather than relying on objective predictors of adjustment such as size and location of visible difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other participants (adolescents and parents) felt that YPF did not meet their needs because the adolescent had lower levels of appearance-related concerns and perceived their visible difference to be less noticeable and stigmatising than examples provided within YPF. These findings, which align with previous qualitative 20 and quantitative findings, 22 , 23 reaffirm the value of obtaining subjective assessments of appearance concerns rather than relying on objective predictors of adjustment such as size and location of visible difference.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Based on the few previous quantitative evaluations of the Norwegian version of YPF, the intervention has displayed potential clinical effectiveness. 22,23 However, gaining knowledge about participants' perceptions of YPF, its acceptability, and their experiences of using it is also vital in order to inform its potential implementation. Two previous studies in the Netherlands and UK have qualitatively explored YPF participants' experiences of the programme.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, only 1 participant (with concurrent diagnosis of eating disorder and clinical depression) was excluded on this basis. Given the findings from a recent study that demonstrated that YPF is safe [ 61 ], it would be interesting for future research to investigate potential intervention effects after completion of YPF for adolescents with moderate-to-severe psychological difficulties receiving psychological support elsewhere to explore whether YPF could be beneficial as an adjunct to other psychological interventions. However, the authors also underscore that YPF was designed to be a low-level intervention, targeting appearance-related and social distress in adolescents with a visible difference, and was not developed for adolescents with more severe psychological difficulties [ 61 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self‐perceptions about one's appearance is a common source of social and psychological distress, especially during adolescence (Ricciardelli & Yager, 2016), and particularly for those involuntarily having an appearance that noticeably deviates from the norm (Crerand, Rumsey, Kazak, Clarke, Rausch & Sarwer, 2020). Young Person's Face IT (YP Face IT; YPF; Williamson, Hamlet, White et al ., 2016), a web‐based self‐guided psychosocial intervention, has demonstrated promising results in reducing psychological distress among adolescents with a visible difference (Kling, Zelihić, Williamson & Feragen, 2022; Zelihić, van Dalen, Kling et al ., 2022). However, health economic evaluations of YPF and similar interventions for this population are lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%