2020
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.12045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Is Emergency Appendicectomy Better Than Elective Appendicectomy for the Treatment of Appendiceal Phlegmon?: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lately [ 21 ], the previous undisputed concept of conservatively treating an appendiceal abscess has been questioned, at least among adult patients. In the laparoscopic era an emergency appendectomy is considered a quick, safe and feasible treatment for appendiceal abscess.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lately [ 21 ], the previous undisputed concept of conservatively treating an appendiceal abscess has been questioned, at least among adult patients. In the laparoscopic era an emergency appendectomy is considered a quick, safe and feasible treatment for appendiceal abscess.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of them were classi ed as grade I and II (ileus and super cial surgical site infection) according to Clavien-Dindo's classi cation, as found in our patients (19). Ahmed et al (20) suggest that there must be a strict following process for patients in order to exclude the presence of hidden pathologies like colitis and even malignancies, especially in elderly patients (20,21). Nonetheless, in our population, no appendiceal, colonic neoplasms, or any other hidden pathologies were documented in pathology reports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Different from the cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) sepsis model which gut perforation and fecal peritonitis are initiated by a puncture of the ligated cecum, mice with cecal ligation without puncture, here, show only a subtle systemic inflammation with relatively low mortality compared with the high mortality rate in CLP sepsis model [ 58 , 59 , 60 ]. The limited mortality in cecal-ligated mice supported the role of greater omentum in the control of intra-abdominal sources of infection (abscess or necrotic tissue) as reported in phlegmon appendicitis [ 5 ]. Although the systemic inflammation after cecal ligation was not severe enough to induce kidney or liver injury, different from the inflammation of the gut–kidney–liver axis in sepsis [ 7 ], the significant inflammatory responses in cecal-ligated mice were demonstrated by an increase in apoptosis of spleen.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Meanwhile, in the cases with successful antibiotic responses, the need for delayed surgical procedures is questioned because of the low risk of recurrent inflammation [ 4 ]. Although several interventions (ultrasonogram and computed tomography) were proposed to indicate the necessity of surgical procedures after successful supportive treatment [ 5 ], an alteration in gut microbiota or gut barrier damage might be another indicator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%