2013
DOI: 10.1080/14747731.2013.806751
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Irrationality and Regulation: Constructing Mad Cow Knowledge in the US–South Korea FTA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Risk plays a crucial role in the regulation of foods and is especially significant since scientific evidence is often inconclusive. Although scientific risk assessments may be perceived to be value-free, neutral, and unbiased (Haack 2003), scientific inquiry incorporates notions of risk and conceptions of scientific evidence (Kang 2013). Technologies include uncertainties, choices for perspectives, and value-loadings, so are not comprised of stand-alone, factual answers (Saltelli and Funtowicz 2004).…”
Section: Assessing Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk plays a crucial role in the regulation of foods and is especially significant since scientific evidence is often inconclusive. Although scientific risk assessments may be perceived to be value-free, neutral, and unbiased (Haack 2003), scientific inquiry incorporates notions of risk and conceptions of scientific evidence (Kang 2013). Technologies include uncertainties, choices for perspectives, and value-loadings, so are not comprised of stand-alone, factual answers (Saltelli and Funtowicz 2004).…”
Section: Assessing Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%