2001
DOI: 10.1007/s004380100506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ionising radiation induces the expression of PARP-1 and PARP-2 genes in Arabidopsis

Abstract: By screening for Arabidopsis genes activated by ionising radiation (IR)-induced DNA damage, we have isolated a cDNA hybridising with a 3.2-kb mRNA that accumulates rapidly and strongly in irradiated cell suspensions or whole plants. The cDNA codes for a 110-kDa protein that is highly homologous to the 116-kDa vertebrate poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1). It is recognised by a human anti-PARP-1 antibody, binds efficiently to DNA strand interruptions in vitro, and catalyses DNA damage-dependent (ADP-ribose) p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
70
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
70
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to untreated controls, PARP1 expression was increased 66-fold (p-value = 0.00015) and PARP2 increased by 8-fold (p-value = 0.0001) (Figure 2B). Although the increase in PARP1 and PARP2 was expected based on previous reports [88], [89], the expression of PARP3 in response to DSBs has not been described. In either treated or untreated seedlings, the qRT-PCR signal for PARP3 was either not detected or was extremely low (C t ≥34) (Figure 2B), suggesting that PARP3 is not upregulated in response to DNA damage in seedlings, and therefore has separate functions from PARP1 and PARP2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Compared to untreated controls, PARP1 expression was increased 66-fold (p-value = 0.00015) and PARP2 increased by 8-fold (p-value = 0.0001) (Figure 2B). Although the increase in PARP1 and PARP2 was expected based on previous reports [88], [89], the expression of PARP3 in response to DSBs has not been described. In either treated or untreated seedlings, the qRT-PCR signal for PARP3 was either not detected or was extremely low (C t ≥34) (Figure 2B), suggesting that PARP3 is not upregulated in response to DNA damage in seedlings, and therefore has separate functions from PARP1 and PARP2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Some additional plant specific folds not present in the HsPARP1 are predicted in AtPARP1 and 2, AtRCD1 and AtSROs (Figure 11A and 11B). These additional predicted features, if present, apparently do not disrupt the activity in AtPARP1, which was shown to exhibit PARP activity (Table 2; [44]). The conserved active site folds also mark the position of the catalytic triad, the three AAs histidine (H), tyrosine (Y) and glutamic acid (E), which is conserved in AtPARP1 and 2 but not AtRCD1 or AtSROs (Figure 11A and 11B; Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To investigate this possibility, we monitored the expression of several transcripts implicated in the DDR ( RAD51 , BREAST CANCER SUSCEPTIBILITY 1 [ BRCA1 ]) and ( poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase 1 [ PARP1 ]; Doucet-Chabeaud et al , 2001; Lafarge and Montané, 2003; Yoshiyama et al , 2009). Quantitative real-time (RT)-PCR was performed using cDNA made from first-generation (G1) ctc1 flowers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%