Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry 2002
DOI: 10.1002/14356007.a14_393
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Ion Exchangers

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
10
2
1
0

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

Range
2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
12
1

Relationship

0
13

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 13 publications

(8 citation statements)
references

References 14 publications

0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The difference in copper content between the HIXs containing Cu 2 O and the ones containing Cu 0 was due to the different ionic form of the functional groups (hydroxylic vs. ascorbate, molar mass 17 vs. 175). Since anion exchangers show low thermal stability [ 38 , 39 ], all the materials investigated in this study were dried in mild conditions (at 40 °C for 24 h). The test results, grouped according to the structure of the host materials (M, G) and the thermal decomposition medium (air, N 2 ), are presented in successive figures.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typically, in the parent resins (M, G) the functional ionogenic groups were surrounded by water molecules, which is referred to as solvation. This phenomenon is due to weak electrostatic interactions and results in the formation of a solvation envelope (a few water molecules thick) around polar functional groups [ 29 , 39 , 40 ]. After Cu 0 was deposited in the anion exchanger’s matrix the configuration near the active groups changed.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gel-like anion exchangers contain less cross-linking agent (about 8% DVB) than macroreticular ion exchangers (about 15% DVB) and the fewer cross linkages an anion exchanger contains, the greater are its elasticity and swelling (this is why gel-like anion exchangers swell much more than macroreticular anion exchangers). Swelling and shrinking are reversible processes and are indeed accompanied by uptake/expulsion of water molecules [ 29 , 39 ]. Therefore one could suppose that in the presence of the water repelling agent the gel-like anion exchangers having a more elastic matrix shrank more than the macroreticular ones (the osmotic force and the elastic force act in opposite directions).…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in agreement with the FTIR analysis results for the examined materials, indicating that after the reduction of Cu 2 O to Cu 0 the area of the broad peak indicative of adsorbed water at 3350 cm −1 decreased and almost vanished in the case of G/Cu [ 33 ]. One of the causes of the higher hygroscopicity of M/Cu 2 O and G/Cu 2 O in comparison with M/Cu and G/Cu could be the presence of functional groups in the OH − form, which shows a very strong affinity for water [ 39 ]. It is worth mentioning than the HIXs with Cu 2 O particles contained clearly less hydration bound water (about 10%) than the HIXs with CuO particles (about 13%) [ 31 ].…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations