2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investor reaction to positive and negative corporate social events

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
47
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
2
47
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, socially irresponsible activities, or NCSR activities, are those activities that "one or more stakeholders perceive to be firm transgressions" (Groening and Kanuri, 2013). Because CSR activities represent positive information, socially irresponsible activities represent negative information about a firm.…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, socially irresponsible activities, or NCSR activities, are those activities that "one or more stakeholders perceive to be firm transgressions" (Groening and Kanuri, 2013). Because CSR activities represent positive information, socially irresponsible activities represent negative information about a firm.…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And this is not aligned with the aim of which corporate social responsibility has in various industries such as product or service; namely the development and spreading social community based activities. The findings of this hypothesis about the development of the society diverge Groening and Kanuri (2013) and Smith and Ong (2015).…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…In an analysis of stakeholder activism targeted at more than 200 US firms between 2004 and 2008, they find that protests did not increase the firms' perceived environmental risk and consequently did not affect their financial performance in the long term. Shareholders' perceptions of protests may mediate their effect on the targeted firms' financial value: An analysis of corporate social events which have either positive or negative effects on other stakeholders shows that shareholders may react positively to events that other stakeholders perceive as negative (Groening and Kanuri 2013).…”
Section: The Effect Of Online Protests On Share Valuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Activist groups thus often aim to influence stakeholders inside and outside the organizational boundaries, who in turn pressure the targeted firm to behave more socially responsible (Aguilera et al 2007). Shareholders are, for example, sensitive to the negative publicity that a protest engenders and may disinvest if they expect this will affect the share price or future cash flows (Groening and Kanuri 2013;Mackey, Mackey, and Barney 2007;Vasi and King 2012). Protests may also affect consumers' image and its associated brands, and purchase intention (Krishnamurthy and Kucuk 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%