2008
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigations into the benefits of base isolation for non‐symmetric rigid blocks

Abstract: SUMMARYIn this paper the influence of base isolation on the behaviour of a work of art has been analysed. To make things more realistic, the work of art has been modelled with a non-symmetrical rigid body, sitting on a base that is connected to a visco-elastic device, which represents the passive control system. To prevent the breaking of the isolation device, security stops have been introduced to limit the displacement of the oscillating base to a maximum safety value. All analyses have been carried out comp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
40
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, for equation (2.4) to be valid, it is implicitly assumed that the block is slender enough, and the coefficient of friction high enough, to prevent other impact behaviours such as bouncing or sliding (Contento & Di Egidio 2009). In reality, it is clear that the coefficient of restitution is not a function of the geometry solely (see Prieto et al 2004;ElGawady et al 2010 and references therein), and hence equation (2.4) should be considered as a theoretical approximation of the coefficient of restitution needed to sustain pure rocking motion.…”
Section: (B) Treatment Of Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for equation (2.4) to be valid, it is implicitly assumed that the block is slender enough, and the coefficient of friction high enough, to prevent other impact behaviours such as bouncing or sliding (Contento & Di Egidio 2009). In reality, it is clear that the coefficient of restitution is not a function of the geometry solely (see Prieto et al 2004;ElGawady et al 2010 and references therein), and hence equation (2.4) should be considered as a theoretical approximation of the coefficient of restitution needed to sustain pure rocking motion.…”
Section: (B) Treatment Of Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This causes severe damages at the BDE and MCE levels, even leading to strength-related (instead of overturning-induced) collapses, especially in artworks made of low tensile strength materials (Borri and Grazini, 2006;Sorace and Terenzi, 2015). An effective alternative installation strategy, increasingly investigated and applied during the last decade, is represented by seismic isolation, either of single objects (Contento and Di Egidio, 2009;Vassiliou and Makris, 2012;Chiozzi et al, 2016) or of groups of artefacts placed on the same floor (Sorace and Terenzi, 2015). The merit of these advanced installation solutions is that a very high protection level is guaranteed to any type of art objects, independently of their specific material, mechanical and geometric characteristics.…”
Section: Observations On Mount Making Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectiveness of a base isolation system of a slender rigid object on elastomeric isolators depends also on the height-to-width aspect ratio of the superstructure [8][9][10]. Hino et al [10] present the design of a slender rigid object on elastomeric isolators based on: (a) ultimate state of tensile strength of isolators, (b) ultimate state of drift of the base isolation story under seismic loading, (c) ultimate state of the axial compressive stress of isolators under dead loads and (d) the prediction of overturning moment at the base under seismic loading.…”
Section: Special Requirements For Elastomeric Isolatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%