2017
DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2017.22.49.17-00037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation using whole genome sequencing of a prolonged restaurant outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium linked to the building drainage system, England, February 2015 to March 2016

Abstract: Following notification of a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium gastroenteritis outbreak, we identified 82 cases linked to a restaurant with symptom onset from 12 February 2015 to 8 March 2016. Seventy-two cases had an isolate matching the nationally unique whole genome sequencing profile (single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) address: 1.1.1.124.395.395). Interviews established exposure to the restaurant and subsequent case–control analysis identified an association with eating carvery buffet food (adjusted… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(26 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as demonstrated here and elsewhere, variant calling pipelines and the various mapping/alignment, SNP calling, and SNP filtering practices that they employ (e.g., removal of recombination and clustered SNPs) can influence the identification of SNPs in WGS data and, thus, the topology of a resulting phylogeny (Pightling et al, 2014, 2015; Croucher et al, 2015; Hwang et al, 2015; Katz et al, 2017; Sandmann et al, 2017). This can be particularly problematic for outbreak and cluster detection in bacterial pathogen surveillance: pairwise SNP thresholds are currently widely used to make initial decisions regarding the inclusion or exclusion of isolates in a given outbreak (Taylor et al, 2015; Gymoese et al, 2017; Mair-Jenkins et al, 2017; McCloskey and Poon, 2017; Walker et al, 2018). In such scenarios, just a few SNPs can be the deciding factor in whether a bacterial pathogen is included or excluded as part of an outbreak or cluster (Katz et al, 2017), rendering the choice of variant calling method as non-trivial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as demonstrated here and elsewhere, variant calling pipelines and the various mapping/alignment, SNP calling, and SNP filtering practices that they employ (e.g., removal of recombination and clustered SNPs) can influence the identification of SNPs in WGS data and, thus, the topology of a resulting phylogeny (Pightling et al, 2014, 2015; Croucher et al, 2015; Hwang et al, 2015; Katz et al, 2017; Sandmann et al, 2017). This can be particularly problematic for outbreak and cluster detection in bacterial pathogen surveillance: pairwise SNP thresholds are currently widely used to make initial decisions regarding the inclusion or exclusion of isolates in a given outbreak (Taylor et al, 2015; Gymoese et al, 2017; Mair-Jenkins et al, 2017; McCloskey and Poon, 2017; Walker et al, 2018). In such scenarios, just a few SNPs can be the deciding factor in whether a bacterial pathogen is included or excluded as part of an outbreak or cluster (Katz et al, 2017), rendering the choice of variant calling method as non-trivial.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current and future NGS activities represented in this national survey were mainly in the context of food-and waterborne outbreak detections and investigations, reflecting the priority for these diseases across Europe and beyond [63,64]. Several criteria should be considered in the process of integrating WGS in a routine laboratory setting [11] in order to know in which situations and for which pathogens it is worthwhile to use NGS. Identifying a set of key drivers that cover all aspects related to the implementation of NGS (utility and feasibility) can help to guide prioritization of pathogens and to efficiently allocate resources.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main added value of implementing WGS during surveillance activities or outbreak investigations is inherent in the higher resolution of the WGS output itself, leading to an increased sensitivity and specificity to identify transmission clusters compared to conventional subtyping methods [6]. As such, there are numerous success stories of outbreak investigations applying WGS that were able to identify to the source of infection and implement targeted control measures to stop further spread, saving resources at the health protection and local authority level [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17]. Other concrete examples of the utility of WGS for national surveillance and local infection control include the guidance of vaccination strategies [18][19][20][21] and antibiotic stewardship [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Norovirus infection can be a huge burden in a community and a major reduction in the illness may be able to be obtained if even a modest proportion of cases can be prevented. A recently published paper suggests that a salmonella outbreak spread from contaminated drains and leaking U-traps [40]. However, as the authors of that paper did not mention why cases only occurred in carvery meat eaters and did not mention the sampling of the carvery (only significant exposure in the case-control study), the source's validity remained somewhat uncertain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%