1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1350-4533(98)00084-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of unsteady flow in a model of a ventricular assist device by numerical modelling and comparison with experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A direct comparison of the current results with the Brunel VAD results should be treated with caution, because of the differences in flow forcing between the two cases (piston-driven vs. diaphragm-driven flows). Although a sinusoidal pressure function was applied at the entrance of the water chamber, the diaphragm displacement deviated slightly from the sinusoidal waveform, due to pressure wave distortion as it moves through the water chamber (18).This deviation shows up when comparing the maximum cross-sectional averaged Reynolds numbers at the end of the inlet/ outlet tubes in the blood chamber, which was 3300 for the Brunel University VAD (2) and 4085 in the present simulations. This difference, along with differences in pressure magnitude, can account for the differences in velocity magnitudes shown in Fig.…”
Section: Blood Flow With Interacting Walls 875mentioning
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A direct comparison of the current results with the Brunel VAD results should be treated with caution, because of the differences in flow forcing between the two cases (piston-driven vs. diaphragm-driven flows). Although a sinusoidal pressure function was applied at the entrance of the water chamber, the diaphragm displacement deviated slightly from the sinusoidal waveform, due to pressure wave distortion as it moves through the water chamber (18).This deviation shows up when comparing the maximum cross-sectional averaged Reynolds numbers at the end of the inlet/ outlet tubes in the blood chamber, which was 3300 for the Brunel University VAD (2) and 4085 in the present simulations. This difference, along with differences in pressure magnitude, can account for the differences in velocity magnitudes shown in Fig.…”
Section: Blood Flow With Interacting Walls 875mentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The VAD used in this work is an idealized diaphragm‐type device, consisting of two hemispherical chambers, each with a diameter of 140 mm, separated by an elastic circular diaphragm. This geometry is based on a simpler VAD model studied at Brunel University (1–3), in which blood was driven into and out of a single hemispherical chamber by a hemispherical piston with prescribed motion. To be consistent with the Brunel VAD, the present model length scale is roughly two times that of a typical VAD, such as the Berlin VAD, which has a length scale of 80 mm (5).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The same order of mesh points was used to describe flow across MHV in several other works. 22,27,29,38 According to Ge et al 18 meshes with resolution of more than 10 6 grid nodes are required to simulate accurately the complex flow across MHV. Moreover, other studies 15,33,40,42 show that the specific leaflets orientation and design, their opening and closing behavior and the hinge mechanism might have a major effect on their hemodynamic and thrmboembolic characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%