2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.12.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the tribological behavior of car body parts in series production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strip drawing test results (Figure 7a-c) were in agreement with the state of the art. The CoF decreases with increasing sliding velocity [4,13,33,34] and with increasing contact pressure [5,6]. As observed in Figure 7, the trend of CoF decreasing with contact pressure was more pronounced from 2 to 10 MPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…The strip drawing test results (Figure 7a-c) were in agreement with the state of the art. The CoF decreases with increasing sliding velocity [4,13,33,34] and with increasing contact pressure [5,6]. As observed in Figure 7, the trend of CoF decreasing with contact pressure was more pronounced from 2 to 10 MPa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…6-10) is significantly higher than on the left side (pos. [16][17][18][19][20] and leads to necking. Differences can also be observed between positions 3 and 13.…”
Section: Controllability and Compensation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, however, optical measurement systems have been preferred, although there is a risk of contamination by oil or dust, which may lower their operational suitability. Camera-based systems are able to capture the skid-line distance to the part flange [15] as well as the local material flow [16] and allow the measurement of the global blank draw-in [17] or at least large parts of the global blank draw-in [18]. While these systems are only able to detect the final state of the drawn part and neglect the draw-in curve, laser displacement sensors can overcome this shortcoming and may be an alternative [13].…”
Section: Introduction and State Of The Artmentioning
confidence: 99%