2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2016.05.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of the novel 4H SiC trench MOSFET with non-uniform doping floating islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Eoxm should be typically <4 MV/cm when the device is in the blocking mode [2]. There have been efforts to address this problem by introducing novel designs such as L‐shaped gate [3], shielded fin‐shaped gate [4], non‐uniform doping floating islands [5], dual P+ shielding region at the trench bottom [6], and so on. Although trench MOSFETs have relatively low Ron×A compared to the planar device due to the absence of JFET region, the resistance due to drift region )(Rdrift of the device is almost the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Eoxm should be typically <4 MV/cm when the device is in the blocking mode [2]. There have been efforts to address this problem by introducing novel designs such as L‐shaped gate [3], shielded fin‐shaped gate [4], non‐uniform doping floating islands [5], dual P+ shielding region at the trench bottom [6], and so on. Although trench MOSFETs have relatively low Ron×A compared to the planar device due to the absence of JFET region, the resistance due to drift region )(Rdrift of the device is almost the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An L-shaped gate (LSG) surrounding the bottom corner of the trench was found to be another way of significantly reducing the peak electric field [13]. Without modifying the basic SiC UMOSFET structure, having a gaussian doping profile within the depletion region also helped in suppressing the electric field crowding at the trench corner [14]. Most of the studies reported have not considered the effect of temperature and stray inductance on device characteristics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%