2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.107.014302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation of isospin-symmetry breaking in mirror energy difference and nuclear mass with ab initio calculations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 102 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ground-state mass excess of Al was determined as ME= keV, which is 97(400) keV smaller than the extrapolated ME= keV in 20 [27]. Subsequently, the proton separation energy of Al was obtained as =90 (10) keV, showing that this nucleus is weakly bound. The measured ground-state mass of Al is compared with predictions from various mass models in Fig.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ground-state mass excess of Al was determined as ME= keV, which is 97(400) keV smaller than the extrapolated ME= keV in 20 [27]. Subsequently, the proton separation energy of Al was obtained as =90 (10) keV, showing that this nucleus is weakly bound. The measured ground-state mass of Al is compared with predictions from various mass models in Fig.…”
Section: mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[10][11][12] In the past few decades, with the emergence of advanced methodologies in both experimental characterization and theoretical simulation, the research focus of catalysis has shied from observing and documenting the macroscopic catalytic phenomena to monitoring and deciphering catalytic processes on the atomic/molecular level. 2,[13][14][15] The idea of structure/mechanism-oriented catalyst design has thus emerged, which offers immense opportunities for developing high-performance CO 2 RR catalysts. Some catalytic systems with specic structures and functions can now be constructed via rational design; with the surface/interface reaction processes ideally customized, catalysts with superior activities, selectivities and stabilities can be obtained eventually.…”
Section: Xin Tanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21,22 In addition, only by looking deep into the surface/interface structures of catalysts can we establish the structure-performance relationship for CO 2 RR catalysis, which is of fundamental importance for developing more advanced electrocatalysts. 2,23 In this review, we start with an overview of the advanced methodologies for probing the structures of catalyst surfaces/ interfaces (including synchrotron-radiation-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy, atomic-resolution electron microscopy, and infrared spectroscopy), which could offer more indepth insights into catalytic structures at the atomic level. Subsequently, we present a systematic overview on the recent progress in customizing the surfaces/interfaces of CO 2 RR electrocatalysts, including atomic-site catalysts (e.g., single-atomic-site catalysts, diatomic-site catalysts), metal catalysts, and metal/oxide catalysts.…”
Section: Xin Tanmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, for -shell isotopes, we selected the 16 O as the inner core, the full shell above the 16 O was chosen as the valence space for both valence protons and valence neutrons, and the remaining higher-energy single-particle states were considered as excluded spaces. By using a sequence of similarity unitary transformations [33,37,[46][47][48][49][50][51][52], the low-energy degrees of freedom from high-energy excitations in many-body systems were decoupled. After that, the VS-IMSRG calculation yielded an effective Hamiltonian within the valence space, which was written as [32,33]…”
Section: Sd Sdmentioning
confidence: 99%