2013
DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.1027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigation and management of antenatally detected hydronephrosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(20 reference statements)
0
13
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The base case consisted of an infant with Society of Fetal Urology (SFU) Grade III or IV HN, without VUR and with an anterior posterior diameter (APD) of the renal pelvis !15 mm. The analysis was performed from a third party payer perspective with a time horizon of 2 years, as this is the current recommendation for CAP duration in this patient population [11]. This study used discounting e the process of adjusting the value of future costs and benefits to allow for their comparison with present day data [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The base case consisted of an infant with Society of Fetal Urology (SFU) Grade III or IV HN, without VUR and with an anterior posterior diameter (APD) of the renal pelvis !15 mm. The analysis was performed from a third party payer perspective with a time horizon of 2 years, as this is the current recommendation for CAP duration in this patient population [11]. This study used discounting e the process of adjusting the value of future costs and benefits to allow for their comparison with present day data [12].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the American Urological Association (AUA), the Society for Fetal Urology (SFU), and the Canadian Urological Association (CUA) all acknowledge that use of CAP for UTI prevention in infants with prenatal HN has been based on low levels of evidence. 1,11 Not surprisingly, the lack of high-quality evidence has resulted in guidelines with varying criteria for prescribing CAP. In 2009, the CUA guidelines on prenatal HN provided Grade D recommendation for CAP use in children with this condition.…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2009, the CUA guidelines on prenatal HN provided Grade D recommendation for CAP use in children with this condition. 11 In 2010, the SFU consensus statement on HN recommended CAP only for infants with high-grade HN and those with VUR. 12 On the other hand, the AUA guidelines suggested the use of CAP for children with asymptomatic VUR (i.e., without previous history of UTI) to be optional.…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recommendations from other expert groups, including the Society for Fetal Urology (SFU) have been published. [1015] This document revises the ISPN guidelines and has been simultaneously published in the February 2013 issue of the Indian Pediatrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%