2010
DOI: 10.1068/a43164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The practice of metropolitan planning manifests a tension between the need for immediate implementation of policies that create cities that are less carbon dependent, can manage urban population growth, and satisfy the need for legitimate policy decisions. The question this raises is how can a decision-making process be designed in such a way that supports a more implementable policy outcome? This tension is played out in the decision-making discourse and is related in the literature on process design. The ten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this sense it follows that rather than tranquillity and its qualities being defined as the right of the State, that tranquillity could be conceived as a common good, produced in and contributing to enhancing protected area environments that in themselves are considered as a new commons, (Pieraccini, 2015), requiring cooperation amongst a wide range of stakeholders on "their protection, management and planning" (ELC, 2012, p.4). Thus to dilute the inclusion of the public's views on determining tranquillity holds the risk of a potential loss of legitimacy of any plan, policy formulation or strategy defined by institutions on behalf of those members of the lay public, who quite simply, are not traditionally nor adequately engaged (Hewlett & Edwards, 2013;Legacy, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this sense it follows that rather than tranquillity and its qualities being defined as the right of the State, that tranquillity could be conceived as a common good, produced in and contributing to enhancing protected area environments that in themselves are considered as a new commons, (Pieraccini, 2015), requiring cooperation amongst a wide range of stakeholders on "their protection, management and planning" (ELC, 2012, p.4). Thus to dilute the inclusion of the public's views on determining tranquillity holds the risk of a potential loss of legitimacy of any plan, policy formulation or strategy defined by institutions on behalf of those members of the lay public, who quite simply, are not traditionally nor adequately engaged (Hewlett & Edwards, 2013;Legacy, 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What results is an exclusive rather than an inclusive forum of discussants being engaged in these studies and in their subsequent applications. Nevertheless, the outputs of such research in planning practice are attractive: planners have long-held a linear and rational approach to informing their decisions (Graham & Healey, 1999;Legacy, 2010), requiring "inquiry-proof' investigations" (Selman, 2002. p.3.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To give but two examples of this we may turn to two recent papers on planning methodology in Great Britain (Baker et al 2010) and Canada and Australia (Legacy 2010). Both papers explicitly deal with stakeholder involvement in strategic planning processes, and as recent publications in leading international planning journals, can be taken to represent the state-of-the-art of contemporary scholarship on planning methodology.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baker et al raise the question concerning how the concept should be defined, but then immediately settle for a definition which appears to assume that the group of stakeholders related to a specific process or territorial entity is a priori given, even though they may fall into different categories and thus have to be approached in different manners and using a variety of more or less innovative methods (Baker et al, 2010: 577). Legacy (2010) on the other hand simply defines stakeholders as "those who will be affected in one way or the other" by the results of planning processes (Legacy 2010(Legacy :2708. Following Susskind & Weinstein we can thus see that Baker et al quickly brush past the substantive question of stakeholderness, i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be considered an extension of the currently accepted concept of 'participation' in SEA and policymaking, triggering analyses of the role of knowledge between stakeholder engagement and planmaking (Legacy 2010). Strauss (1978) notes " [W]herever there are social orders, there are not only negotiated orders but also coerced orders, manipulated orders and the like" (p. 262), and exploring such dimensions could lead to shared SEA design, implementation and then appraisal involving all the stakeholders to whom SEA is addressed (Cashmore et al 2008).…”
Section: Stakeholders' Engagement In Adaptive Learning: the Backcastimentioning
confidence: 99%