“…[26] These two hydroxylated silica surfaces were selected because of their similarity to amorphous silica underwater,w here surface silicon atoms rapidly react with water to form silanols.T he main results from this study were that 1) pyrocatechol showed ah igher affinity (14.15 and 11.65 kcal mol À1 for the (001) and (111) surfaces, respectively) than did water molecules (1.98 and 0.57 kcal mol À1 ), 2) the underlying lattice noticeably affects the adsorption process (pyrocatechol can establish four hydrogen bonds with the (001) lattice but only three with the (111) surface), and 3) irrespective of the surface,catechols prefer to stand upright, that is,n early perpendicular to the surface plane,rather than lay flat. Taking into account this geometry and an average energy of approximately 3.7 kcal mol À1 per bond, it is feasible to consider hydrogen bonding (typically between 2.4 and 6.2 kcal mol À1 ) [27] the most important interaction with amorphous wet silica surfaces.R elated calculations [28] and ab initio molecular dynamic (MD) simulations performed by Ganz and co-workers [29] also supported these results.The authors demonstrated that pyrocatechol displaces preadsorbed water molecules from the substrate by forming competitive hydrogen bonds and the help of dispersion forces from the phenylene ring. [29,30] Finally,b oth DFT and MD calculations noted the torsion capacity of the hydroxy bonds as the origin of the enhanced versatility of catechols to effectively establish hydrogen bonds with different underlying lattices,s ince they can freely rotate with respect to the phenylene ring to find an optimal adsorption geometry.…”