2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating the accuracy of photointerpreted unvegetated channel widths in a braided river system: a Platte River case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We suspect that interpretation uncertainty will be high in rivers that experience a large change in wetted channel area given a proportionately small change in discharge (e.g. braided rivers), because low‐elevation bars are frequently wetted but not scoured, which allows fast‐growing vegetation to encroach on these surfaces (Werbylo et al ., 2017). In such rivers, vegetation density is a poor proxy for the active channel, and the digitizer must use professional judgement in placing the active channel boundary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We suspect that interpretation uncertainty will be high in rivers that experience a large change in wetted channel area given a proportionately small change in discharge (e.g. braided rivers), because low‐elevation bars are frequently wetted but not scoured, which allows fast‐growing vegetation to encroach on these surfaces (Werbylo et al ., 2017). In such rivers, vegetation density is a poor proxy for the active channel, and the digitizer must use professional judgement in placing the active channel boundary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pearse et al (2017) estimated unobstructed channel width from the perspective of cranes, determining it as the distance across the channel, including bare soil and vegetation under 1.5 m in height. Werbylo et al (2017) considered unvegetated channel width as including sandbars with <25% vegetative cover. For the purposes of this study, we considered the "unobstructed channel width" as the distance from bank to opposite bank, including areas of active flow and unstabilized sandbars.…”
Section: Habitat Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We manually measured "total unobstructed channel width" (UOCW) in ArcGIS 10.5.1 by broadly following the techniques of Werbylo et al (2017;Fig. 3).…”
Section: Habitat Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerial photographs are thus commonly used to document and measure planform channel changes of at the most the last century, in a wide variety of fluvial settings. Requiring data coregistration and river bank digitisation, these planimetric studies generally result in the extraction of morphological metrics such as channel width (Gilvear, 2004;Werbylo et al, 2017;Winterbottom, 2000) or lateral migration (Hooke and Yorke, 2010;Janes et al, 2017;Mandarino et al, 2019;O'Connor et al, 2003) to characterise their evolution in time (e.g. rates of lateral migration).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, two major sources of spatial uncertainties inherently question the robustness of these planimetric methods: the delineation error due to digitisation of river banks Güneralp et al, 2014;Gurnell et al, 1994;Micheli and Kirchner, 2002;Werbylo et al, 2017) and the geometric error due to data coregistration (Gaeuman et al, 2005;Hughes et al, 2006;Liébault and Piégay, 2001;Payraudeau et al, 2010;Swanson et al, 2011). Whatever the scope of the study and 15 the environmental context, these uncertainties needs to be assessed as accurately as possible (De Rose and Basher, 2011;Donovan et al, 2019;Mount and Louis, 2005;Mount et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%