2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.12.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Investigating impacts of chemistry and transport model formulation on model performance at European scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the methodology used in previous publications describing the AQMEII Phase 1 results, the evaluation was undertaken with respect to station type (Hogrefe et al, 2013;Nopmongcol et al, 2012;Pirovano et al, 2012) and with respect to climatic differences between geographical regions in Europe (Solazzo et al, 2012a, b;Pirovano et al, 2012;Putaud et al, 2010). However, in contrast to previous publications, four different climatic regions were chosen in our analysis.…”
Section: Modelling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Following the methodology used in previous publications describing the AQMEII Phase 1 results, the evaluation was undertaken with respect to station type (Hogrefe et al, 2013;Nopmongcol et al, 2012;Pirovano et al, 2012) and with respect to climatic differences between geographical regions in Europe (Solazzo et al, 2012a, b;Pirovano et al, 2012;Putaud et al, 2010). However, in contrast to previous publications, four different climatic regions were chosen in our analysis.…”
Section: Modelling Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CAMx performance was the worst at urban stations in January while in July the bias was lower. Also, Pirovano et al (2012) reported a strong underestimation of ozone concentrations during the first part of the year for CAMx and CHIMERE models. CMAQ results, described in Appel et al (2012), indicate that model performance for the daytime ozone varied seasonally.…”
Section: Ozonementioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations