1992
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-1992-1079701-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverses généralisés d’opérateurs non bornés

Abstract: Abstract.This paper is devoted to the definition and the study of the generalized inverses of unbounded densely defined closed operators in Banach and Hubert spaces. In this latter case an identity is established that links the orthogonal projection on the graph of an operator to the orthogonal projection on the graph of its Moore-Penrose inverse.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…is the canonical embedding of K 1 into K. Now Propositions 2.1 and 2.3 yield the following corollary, which is a slight generalization of the main result in [12], see also [9].…”
Section: Compact and Finite Rank Perturbations 155mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…is the canonical embedding of K 1 into K. Now Propositions 2.1 and 2.3 yield the following corollary, which is a slight generalization of the main result in [12], see also [9].…”
Section: Compact and Finite Rank Perturbations 155mentioning
confidence: 53%
“…These results follow directly from the properties of a * -generalized inverse and lemma 1.3 [15]. The existence of a unique maximal * -generalized inverse is now given by the following theorem:…”
Section: Generalizedmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…Weakly regular operators may be connected with the notion of strict generalized inverse of Labrousse [15]. Actually, one can prove that an operator A admits a strict generalized * -inverse if and only if it is weakly regular, and in this case, the inverse is weakly regular, hence unique and precisely A + .…”
Section: Corollary 29 Let a Be Closed And Weakly Regular Then It Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the operators (I + A * A) −1 and A(I + A * A) −1 are everywhere defined and bounded, and (I + A * A) −1 is selfadjoint. Moreover, [16,18]). In the following, we state some useful identities due to Labrousse [18] and Labrousse and Mbekhta [19].…”
Section: New Results About the Moore-penrose Inversementioning
confidence: 97%
“…For extensive results and applications concerning the Moore-Penrose inverse concept, we refer the reader to [8,16,18,19] and references therein. The following results are, to the best of our knowledge, new.…”
Section: New Results About the Moore-penrose Inversementioning
confidence: 99%