2007
DOI: 10.1145/1276927.1276931
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inverse transformed density rejection for unbounded monotone densities

Abstract: A new algorithm for sampling from largely arbitrary monotone, unbounded densities is presented. The user has to provide a program to evaluate the density and its derivative and the location of the pole. Then the setup of the new algorithm constructs different hat functions for the pole region and for the tail region, respectively. For the pole region a new method is developed that uses a transformed density rejection hat function of the inverse density. As the order of the pole is calculated in the setup, cond… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 1 summarizes the main techniques proposed in literature for this purpose. In some specific situations, rejection samplers [5,22,23,33,49] and their adaptive version, as the adaptive rejection sampler (ARS) [16], are employed to generate one sample from each πd per iteration. Since the standard ARS can be applied only to log-concave densities, several extensions have been introduced [21,17,37].…”
Section: Monte Carlo-within-gibbs Sampling Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 1 summarizes the main techniques proposed in literature for this purpose. In some specific situations, rejection samplers [5,22,23,33,49] and their adaptive version, as the adaptive rejection sampler (ARS) [16], are employed to generate one sample from each πd per iteration. Since the standard ARS can be applied only to log-concave densities, several extensions have been introduced [21,17,37].…”
Section: Monte Carlo-within-gibbs Sampling Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ARS algorithms are very appealing techniques since they construct a non-parametric proposal to mimic the shape of the target pdf, yielding in general excellent performance (i.e., independent samples from πd with a high acceptance rate). samplers (Ca↵o et al, 2002;Hörmann, 2002;Hörmann et al, 2007;Marrelec and Benali, 2004;Tanizaki, 1999) and their adaptive version, as the adaptive rejection sampler (ARS) Gilks and Wild (1992), are employed to generate one sample from each ⇡d per iteration. Since the standard ARS can be applied only to lo-concave densities, several extensions have been introduced Hörmann (1995a); Görür and Teh (2011); Martino and Míguez (2011).…”
Section: Monte Carlo-within-gibbs Sampling Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even sampling from π can often be complicated. In some specific situations, rejection samplers [41][42][43][44][45] and their adaptive versions, adaptive rejection sampling (ARS) algorithms, are employed to generate (one) sample from π [12, 19, 25, 27-29, 40, 46, 47]. The ARS algorithms are very appealing techniques since they construct a non-parametric proposal in order to mimic the shape of the target pdf, yielding in general excellent performance (i.e., independent samples from π with an high acceptance rate).…”
Section: Range Of Applicability and Multivariate Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%