2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12571-017-0668-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inuit food security in canada: arctic marine ethnoecology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Half of the articles in our review ( n = 42) referred to gender, but upon closer examination, most in fact were found to only be referring to collecting (Amparo et al., 2017; Limuwa et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2018) or reporting (Brewer et al., 2017; Savo et al., 2017) sex‐disaggregated data, without interpreting the influence of gender (or agency) on food systems processes and outcomes. Similarly, seven articles engaged with women (but not gender), in the form of analysis of consumption of fish by women, or both women and men, particularly its importance for nutrition, pregnancy and child development (Love et al., 2017; Marushka et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2019; Watts et al., 2017), women's perceptions of food (Sato et al., 2019; Traoré et al., 2018), or specific food‐related issues like meal interventions in schools (Bersamin et al., 2019). We found no articles that examined gender norms and relations, or women's control over income or care burdens—both of which directly shape food access, and/or consumption and nutritional outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Half of the articles in our review ( n = 42) referred to gender, but upon closer examination, most in fact were found to only be referring to collecting (Amparo et al., 2017; Limuwa et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2018) or reporting (Brewer et al., 2017; Savo et al., 2017) sex‐disaggregated data, without interpreting the influence of gender (or agency) on food systems processes and outcomes. Similarly, seven articles engaged with women (but not gender), in the form of analysis of consumption of fish by women, or both women and men, particularly its importance for nutrition, pregnancy and child development (Love et al., 2017; Marushka et al., 2019; Smith et al., 2019; Watts et al., 2017), women's perceptions of food (Sato et al., 2019; Traoré et al., 2018), or specific food‐related issues like meal interventions in schools (Bersamin et al., 2019). We found no articles that examined gender norms and relations, or women's control over income or care burdens—both of which directly shape food access, and/or consumption and nutritional outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some communities may have significant access to caribou as a protein source, while others may not. The need for an educational approach to community-based food security 5,8 is extreme in the Canadian Arctic due to the isolation of the communities and a lack of affordable transportation for protein from southern Canada sources. In the Philippines there is a tendency to take the marine sources of protein somewhat for granted as there is no systematic approach to meet manage coastal resources nor goals for maternal protein intake requirements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimating the protein content of salmon at approximately 20% by weight it is possible to determine the per capita marine protein availability from fish harvest (Figure 1) and convert that to daily consumption for a 50kg maternal person. In addition to this is the consumption of caribou as mentioned above, as well as marine mammals5 .However marine mammal harvest is thought to primarily involve fats with an unknown and likely limited contribution to protein requirements. The price of protein imported form Southern Canada is generally considered to be beyond the reach of many Inuit people and is not considered in the current work.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little is known about the habitat use of juvenile anadromous Arctic char owing to complex logistic associated with sampling in northern rivers, to the challenges associated with fry observation (Godiksen et al 2012) and to their cryptic behavior (Heggenes and Saltveit 2007). As anadromous Arctic char are culturally important and a key resource to achieve food security for the Inuit of Canada (Watts et al 2017;Dewailly et al 2002), it is relevant to understand how juveniles might be vulnerable to climate change in their rearing habitats, specifically in streams prone to summer warming and/or low flows. The first step to assess this vulnerability is to understand the habitat use and preferences of juvenile Arctic char.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%