Role of General Mental Ability in Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology 2002
DOI: 10.4324/9781410608802-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to the Special Issue: Role of General Mental Ability in Industrial, Work, and Organizational Psychology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, Ones and Viswesvaran (2023) assert that empirical work shows comparable observed validity for cognitive tests in predictive and current studies, from which one can infer that comparable degrees of range restriction are present in both. There are some issues with this conclusion.…”
Section: Response To Ones and Viswesvaranmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In contrast, Ones and Viswesvaran (2023) assert that empirical work shows comparable observed validity for cognitive tests in predictive and current studies, from which one can infer that comparable degrees of range restriction are present in both. There are some issues with this conclusion.…”
Section: Response To Ones and Viswesvaranmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Ones and Viswesvaran (2023) cite Hartigan and Wigdor (1989), among others, in support of their position of predictive and concurrent studies producing comparable observed validity. Hartigan and Wigdor analyzed GATB data, and in that dataset all studies did not use the GATB for selection.…”
Section: Response To Ones and Viswesvaranmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Such categories are also especially popular in the field of human resources (HR) selection, in individual psychological assessment as well as assessment centers, etc. (Landy & Shankster, 1994;Carretta & Ree, 2000;Gottfredson, 2002;Ones & Viswesvaran, 2002). This paper suggests that the traditional, hierarchical structure of intelligence or more precisely -its factors may have changed at least in certain current HR selection settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%