2016
DOI: 10.1201/b15151
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introduction to Risk Parity and Budgeting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
91
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ratio is by construction always larger or equal to 1 and the investor typically prefers a higher value of the DR (Choueifaty and Coignard 2008). Finally, both the WDiv and RDiv measure the concentration of the portfolio in terms of weights and risk (Maillard et al 2010, Roncalli 2013. The WDiv ranges from 1 k for a perfectly concentrated portfolio to 1 for the equally weighted portfolio and can be computed as:…”
Section: Correlation -Sp500mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This ratio is by construction always larger or equal to 1 and the investor typically prefers a higher value of the DR (Choueifaty and Coignard 2008). Finally, both the WDiv and RDiv measure the concentration of the portfolio in terms of weights and risk (Maillard et al 2010, Roncalli 2013. The WDiv ranges from 1 k for a perfectly concentrated portfolio to 1 for the equally weighted portfolio and can be computed as:…”
Section: Correlation -Sp500mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But even in the GMV set-up, the sample covariance matrix might exhibit estimation error that can easily accumulate, especially when dealing with a large number of assets (Michaud 1989, Ledoit and Wolff 2003, DeMiguel and Nogales 2009, Fan et al 2012). Furthermore, as a result of multicollinearity and extreme observations, the Markowitz's set-up often leads to undesirable and unrealistic extreme long and short positions, which can hardly be implemented in practice due to regulatory and short selling constraints (Shefrin and Statman 2000, DeMiguel et al 2009b, Boyle et al 2012, Roncalli 2013). An ideal portfolio then has conservative asset weights, which are stable in time, to avoid high turnover and transaction costs, while still promoting the right amount of diversification and being able to control the total amount of shorting.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conclude the section by presenting our major empirical findings. For further details about portfolio optimization procedures, we refer to the recent books of Jondeau et al (2007), Roncalli (2014), andEmbrechts (2015).…”
Section: Application To Portfolio Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These indicators fluctuate in time and are also characterized by some covariance matrix Q ij = E[p i p j ]. 4 This matrix is in general non trivial, as one may systematically predict similar returns for two different assets i and j, leading to Q ij > 0. In any case, one can as above build N uncorrelated linear combinations of indicators, given by:…”
Section: Symmetriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unfortunately, the practical implementation of Markowitz' ideas is fraught with difficulties and yields very disappointing results. This has been known for long, with many papers attempting to identify its flaws and suggesting remedies [1,2,3,4,5,6]. The most important problems are well understood: the optimally diversified Markowitz portfolio often ends up -somewhat paradoxically -being very concentrated on a few assets only, which inevitably leads to disastrous out-of-sample risks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%