Managing Money and Discord in the UN 2019
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780198838333.003.0001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: This chapter introduces the main debates that this book contributes to and outlines how various disciplines—Public Administration and International Relations, Public Policy and Political Economy—look at budgeting, and, in particular, how these relate to the changing system of international cooperation and of international organizations. Scholars and practitioners alike question how far states still come together in today’s IOs to prioritize solutions for global challenges and whether states are able to provide… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, results from robustness checks reported in Table D in the Appendix that use more fine‐grained data on IO budgets show that budgetary capacity could in fact be a significant predictor for the ability of IOs to profit from crisis. We know from scholarship on the resourcing of IOs that the idiosyncrasies of individual IOs matter beyond overall budget data: whether IOs can rely on core funding in the regular budget or voluntary funding by donors, the extent to which funding is earmarked, and what budgetary flexibility is available (Goetz and Patz, 2017 ; Graham, 2015 , 2017 ; Patz and Goetz, 2019 ). A similar caveat also applies for H2c on leadership.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, results from robustness checks reported in Table D in the Appendix that use more fine‐grained data on IO budgets show that budgetary capacity could in fact be a significant predictor for the ability of IOs to profit from crisis. We know from scholarship on the resourcing of IOs that the idiosyncrasies of individual IOs matter beyond overall budget data: whether IOs can rely on core funding in the regular budget or voluntary funding by donors, the extent to which funding is earmarked, and what budgetary flexibility is available (Goetz and Patz, 2017 ; Graham, 2015 , 2017 ; Patz and Goetz, 2019 ). A similar caveat also applies for H2c on leadership.…”
Section: Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Increasing politicization in combination with member states cutting resources, withdrawing from institutions, or setting up alternative venues for cooperation has impacted IOs in profound ways (e.g. von Borzykowski and Vabulas, 2019 ; Hale et al, 2013 ; Patz and Goetz, 2019 ; Zürn, 2018 ). The exogenous shock of COVID‐19 has further exacerbated pressures with many states pursuing domestic strategies at the expense of multilateral cooperation.…”
Section: At a Critical Juncturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Yet if such structures do not exist, are weak, disembodied, or false at the global level, what are the implications for an IO administration agenda? This includes acknowledging any implications for IO administrative research in typical public administration studies as such as leadership (Xu & Weller, 2019), personnel management, collaborative governance, and budgeting (Moloney, 2019; Moloney & Stoycheva, 2018; Patz & Goetz, 2019), to name a few.…”
Section: Opportunities For Public Administration Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In lieu of public administration’s disciplinary engagement, constructivism has become a dominant approach for “looking inside” IOs for international relations and, with an organizational sociology modification, many Europe-based international public administration (IPA) scholars. Public administration’s historical disengagement from IO studies has slowed the application of our disciplinary ideas to international organization studies & even if the tide is turning (e.g., Bauer & Ege, 2016, 2017; Patz & Goetz, 2019; Xu & Weller, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%