Introduction

Haukkala, Hiski; Wetering, Carina van de; Vuorelma, Johanna

doi:10.4324/9781315209838-0

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There is an agreement in the literature that signals of uncooperative behavior or sanctioning do not help to develop trust. 266 Missing trust, in turn, affects the stability of international relations and impacts the behavior of conditional cooperators.…”

Section: The Difference In Stabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Rewarding in International Law

Aaken

Şimşek

2021

Am. j. int. law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Why states comply with international law has long been at the forefront of international law and international relations scholarship. The compliance discussion has largely focused on negative incentives. We argue that there is another, undertheorized mechanism: rewarding. We provide a typology and illustrations of how rewards can be applied. Furthermore, we explore the rationale, potential, and limitations of rewarding, drawing on rationalist and psychological approaches. Both approaches provide ample justifications for making greater use of rewarding in international law.

show abstract

Section: The Difference In Stabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Rewarding in International Law

Aaken

Şimşek

2021

Am. j. int. law

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Theoretical reasons are explained in detail in the literature on the role of mistrust in international relations (Brugger et al, 2017; Haukkala et al, 2018; Ruzicka & Keating, 2015). In brief, in the absence of trust, the states seek to minimize the risks of unwanted outcomes in their relationship with other states (Hoffman, 2002; Kydd, 2007).…”

Section: Mistrust Hedging and The Cost Of Dominancementioning

confidence: 99%

Trade-offs and inconsistencies of the Russian foreign policy: The case of Eurasia

Бусыгина¹,

Филиппов

2021

Journal of Eurasian Studies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we explore the inherent trade-offs and inconsistencies of Russia’s policies toward the post-Soviet space. We argue that attempts to rebuild an image of Russia as a “great power” have actually led to a reduction of Russian influence in the post-Soviet region. The more Russia acted as a “Great Power,” the less credible was its promise to respect the national sovereignty of the former Soviet republics. In 2011, Vladimir Putin declared that during his next term as president, his goal would be to establish a powerful supra-national Eurasian Union capable of becoming one of the poles in a multipolar world. However, Russia’s attempt to force Ukraine to join the Eurasian Union provoked the 2014 crisis. The Ukrainian crisis has de-facto completed the separation of Ukraine and Russia and made successful post-Soviet re-integration around Russia improbable.

show abstract

Trans-atlantic (mis)trust in perspective: asymmetry, abandonment and alliance cohesion

Pesu

Sinkkonen

2023

Cambridge Review of International Affairs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction

Cited by 4 publications

References 1 publication

Rewarding in International Law

Rewarding in International Law

Trade-offs and inconsistencies of the Russian foreign policy: The case of Eurasia

Trans-atlantic (mis)trust in perspective: asymmetry, abandonment and alliance cohesion

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About