2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ece.2012.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing sustainability assessment and selection (SAS) into chemical engineering education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research suggests that one of the methods of teaching sustainability to future engineers is to incorporate sustainability courses into the engineering education curriculum. Several researchers have proposed methods related to the integration of sustainability into undergraduate (Lehmann et al , 2008; Othman et al , 2012; Glassey and Haile, 2012; Olsen et al , 2018; Missimer and Connell, 2012; Svanström et al , 2012; Pargman and Eriksson, 2013; Lu, 2015; Aktas et al , 2015; Weatherton et al , 2015; Tsai, 2012; Price and Robinson, 2015) and postgraduate (Lehmann et al , 2008; Staniškis and Katiliūtė, 2016; Othman et al , 2012; Colombo and Alves, 2017; Olsen et al , 2018; Colombo et al , 2015; Aktas et al , 2015) education, which are discussed throughout the paper. However, discussion based on engineering education is rare in literature and also found reviews are constructed with a small number of papers (Thürer et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that one of the methods of teaching sustainability to future engineers is to incorporate sustainability courses into the engineering education curriculum. Several researchers have proposed methods related to the integration of sustainability into undergraduate (Lehmann et al , 2008; Othman et al , 2012; Glassey and Haile, 2012; Olsen et al , 2018; Missimer and Connell, 2012; Svanström et al , 2012; Pargman and Eriksson, 2013; Lu, 2015; Aktas et al , 2015; Weatherton et al , 2015; Tsai, 2012; Price and Robinson, 2015) and postgraduate (Lehmann et al , 2008; Staniškis and Katiliūtė, 2016; Othman et al , 2012; Colombo and Alves, 2017; Olsen et al , 2018; Colombo et al , 2015; Aktas et al , 2015) education, which are discussed throughout the paper. However, discussion based on engineering education is rare in literature and also found reviews are constructed with a small number of papers (Thürer et al , 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Civil and environmental engineering programs were most popular among the academic programs with sustainability transformation because of their disciplinary emphasis on environmental practices (Aurandt and Butler, 2011; Dancz et al , 2018; Stanford et al , 2013; Watson and Barrella, 2017; Weatherton et al , 2015; Wolcott et al , 2011). Chemical engineering programs were also noteworthy in their efforts to integrate sustainability into the curricula (Glassey and Haile, 2012; Jollands and Parthasarathy, 2013; Othman et al , 2012; Shing et al , 2016; von Blottnitz, 2006; Zadorsky, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently sustainability is taught more in some engineering disciplines such as environmental, chemical and civil engineering 9 , but since sustainability needs to be considered in every activity that any engineer performs, it is imperative that all engineering students should have a strong background in sustainability, which makes it necessary to integrate sustainability into the existing courses throughout the engineering programs 10 . Integration of sustainability in engineering education is vital to understand the social and environmental implications of a modern technology that makes engineers to incorporate sustainability into their design 11 .…”
Section: Standalone and Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%