2022
DOI: 10.7554/elife.75540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrinsic timescales as an organizational principle of neural processing across the whole rhesus macaque brain

Abstract: Hierarchical temporal dynamics are a fundamental computational property of the brain; however, there are no whole-brain, noninvasive investigations into timescales of neural processing in animal models. To that end, we used the spatial resolution and sensitivity of ultrahigh field fMRI performed at 10.5 Tesla to probe timescales across the whole macaque brain. We uncovered within-species consistency between timescales estimated from fMRI and electrophysiology. Crucially, we extended existing electrophysiologic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present data shows changes in human lPFC with extensive learning that may parallel changes in activity patterns and representations observed in NHP electrophysiology studies after WM training (Qi et al, 2019;Riley et al, 2018). However, it is difficult to fully bridge across discrepancies in measurement techniques and species: While BOLD fMRI signals can correlate with representations detected via multi-unit activity and high-gamma LFP (Klink et al, 2021;Manea et al, 2022), there is a complicated relationship between spiking activity, LFP signals, and BOLD measurements (Mukamel et al, 2005;Nir et al, 2007;Shi et al, 2017). Ultimately, paradigms using identical tasks, training timelines, and stimuli will be needed to compare the effects of learning on WM neural data between NHP and humans.…”
Section: Plasticity Of the Pfcsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…The present data shows changes in human lPFC with extensive learning that may parallel changes in activity patterns and representations observed in NHP electrophysiology studies after WM training (Qi et al, 2019;Riley et al, 2018). However, it is difficult to fully bridge across discrepancies in measurement techniques and species: While BOLD fMRI signals can correlate with representations detected via multi-unit activity and high-gamma LFP (Klink et al, 2021;Manea et al, 2022), there is a complicated relationship between spiking activity, LFP signals, and BOLD measurements (Mukamel et al, 2005;Nir et al, 2007;Shi et al, 2017). Ultimately, paradigms using identical tasks, training timelines, and stimuli will be needed to compare the effects of learning on WM neural data between NHP and humans.…”
Section: Plasticity Of the Pfcsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…A robust functional hierarchy has been described that situates different cortical brain regions along a sensorimotor-association axis (Bernhardt et al, 2022;Burt et al, 2018;Harris et al, 2019;Margulies et al, 2016;Sydnor et al, 2021). Besides discriminating functional roles of different cortical territories, variation in other physiological properties of the cortex occur along a similar topography to the functional hierarchy (Burt et al, 2018;Fulcher et al, 2019;Gao et al, 2020;Wang, 2020), and it may serve as a principal avenue for directional functional signals (Manea et al, 2022;Pines et al, 2022;Siegle et al, 2021;Vézquez-Rodríguez et al, 2020). Cortical peaks in the functional hierarchy are distributed nearly maximally distant from one another (Margulies et al, 2016;Oligschläger et al, 2019), suggesting that the functional hierarchy may arise due to interacting underlying transcriptomic gradients (Wagstyl et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a hypothesis would imply that it would predict variability in integration time-constants in other domains (for example, auditory evidence integration (Brunton et al, 2013; Keung et al, 2019; McWalter and McDermott, 2018) or more broadly cognitive tasks that involve continuous maintenance and manipulation of information across time in working memory). If so, it may also be possible to relate variabilty in behavioural time constants to underlying neurobiological causes by measuring the resting autocorrelation structure of neural activity, for example in MEG or fMRI data (Cavanagh et al, 2020; Manea et al, 2022; Raut et al, 2020). On the other hand, the individual variability we observe may be a consequence of the prior expectations that our participants have about the overall task structure, combined with learning over the course of training.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%