2018
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syy017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraspecific Niche Models for Ponderosa Pine (Pinus ponderosa) Suggest Potential Variability in Population-Level Response to Climate Change

Abstract: Unique responses to climate change can occur across intraspecific levels, resulting in individualistic adaptation or movement patterns among populations within a given species. Thus, the need to model potential responses among genetically distinct populations within a species is increasingly recognized. However, predictive models of future distributions are regularly fit at the species level, often because intraspecific variation is unknown or is identified only within limited sample locations. In this study, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is an important, but perhaps overlooked consideration when inferring suitable refugia during the LGM. Unique responses to climate change have been shown to occur between intraspecific groups, which can result in differences in adaptation or dispersal between populations within a species (Maguire, Shinneman, Potter, & Hipkins, ; Pearman, D'Amen, Graham, Thuiller, & Zimmermann, ). As expected, accounting for phylogeographic structure when forecasting species' distributions onto models of future climate change has demonstrated that predicted distributions are smaller than when not considering this structure (Valladares et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is an important, but perhaps overlooked consideration when inferring suitable refugia during the LGM. Unique responses to climate change have been shown to occur between intraspecific groups, which can result in differences in adaptation or dispersal between populations within a species (Maguire, Shinneman, Potter, & Hipkins, ; Pearman, D'Amen, Graham, Thuiller, & Zimmermann, ). As expected, accounting for phylogeographic structure when forecasting species' distributions onto models of future climate change has demonstrated that predicted distributions are smaller than when not considering this structure (Valladares et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, to explain the demography of this oak species, we only considered seven simple scenarios with global population changes during the ABC analyses (Supplementary Figure S1 and Supplementary Table S4 ); also, the genetic structure of populations was not simulated due to small sample size and insufficient genetic information of the individuals in each phylogenetic cluster. Considering the potential variability of responses to climate change and environmental disturbance across intraspecific levels ( Maguire et al, 2018 ), the two genetic clusters of Q. liaotungensis (Figure 2 ) might be the result of differences in spatial and temporal responses during the glacial-interglacial transitions of the Quaternary. Moreover, gene flow between the two phylogenetic clusters and closely related species (e.g., Q. mongolica , Zeng et al, 2011 ) were not accounted for in our ABC simulation; all of these factors could lead to an underestimation of effective population sizes and time of population changes for Q. liaotungensis .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, no current approach accounts for the historical role of speciation and adaptation in determining species present-day niches. While there have been several recent developments of ENMs that incorporate a phylogenetic dimension (Smith et al 2018; Morales-Castilla et al 2017; Maguire et al 2018), these have mostly aimed to account for the statistical problem of non-independence due to relatedness among contemporary species, rather than to model the historical development of niches through evolutionary time. By combining ENMs and niche evolution models in the same statistical framework, the approach we present in this paper allows for species present-day niches to be shaped by evolutionary history and allows us to test historical hypotheses of niche evolution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been advances in incorporating evolutionary information to improve current niche estimation (Smith et al 2018), such as estimating a species’ niche by aggregating its subspecies’ niches (Maguire et al 2018) or modelling niches of multiple species while accounting for their phylogenetic non-independence (Morales-Castilla et al 2017), we still lack a method that can simultaneously infer the history of niche evolution and estimate current niches. In this study, we present a method that combines, in a single statistical framework, an environmental niche model (ENM) and a phylogenetic comparative method (PCM) to reconstruct niche evolution.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%