2017
DOI: 10.14194/ijmbr.5.3.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrapartum symphysio-fundal height measurement as a predictor of low birth weight in a low resource setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
2
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(9 reference statements)
1
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Enaohwo study showed that prediction of low birth weight with fundal height had a low sensitivity but a high specificity, PPV and NPV. However, this is at variance with other studies that showed a high sensitivity for prediction of low birth weight [33]. This difference may also be due to differences in population, number of samples and duration of data collection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Enaohwo study showed that prediction of low birth weight with fundal height had a low sensitivity but a high specificity, PPV and NPV. However, this is at variance with other studies that showed a high sensitivity for prediction of low birth weight [33]. This difference may also be due to differences in population, number of samples and duration of data collection.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Parvin et al and Enaohwo et al also found significant positive correlation of new born birth weight with symphysis-fundal height. 13,14 The correlation coefficient revealed a good correlation of SFH with BW as with previous reports from earlier studies. 15 There are some limitations of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Mean birth weight in the study of Enaohwo et al was 3184±502 gm (1600 to 4300 gm). 13 Parvin et al found mean birth weight 3.08±0.38 kg. 14 Mean symphysis-fundal height 32.76±3.73 cm and maximum (48.5%) pregnant mother had SFH in 35-36 cm group, followed by 30.5% had ≤30 cm and 21.0% had 31-34 cm in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation