2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2009.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intraocular lens power calculation and optimized constants for highly myopic eyes

Abstract: Results indicate that the SRK II formula cannot be recommended for IOL power calculation in highly myopic patients. With optimized constants, the SRK/T, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and Holladay 1 formulas produced small deviation of postoperative refraction from target refraction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
67
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
67
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there was no consensus regarding the most accurate standard formulas in negative-power IOL. Hagis formula, Hoffer Q formula or SRK/T have all been suggested as the most accurate formula in different studies, while some did not show significant differences between the formulas [5,22,23]. Apart from the widespread approach of targeting at a more myopic refraction, several solutions have been suggested to address this problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Currently, there was no consensus regarding the most accurate standard formulas in negative-power IOL. Hagis formula, Hoffer Q formula or SRK/T have all been suggested as the most accurate formula in different studies, while some did not show significant differences between the formulas [5,22,23]. Apart from the widespread approach of targeting at a more myopic refraction, several solutions have been suggested to address this problem.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the widespread approach of targeting at a more myopic refraction, several solutions have been suggested to address this problem. These included the use of specific IOL constants for eyes with long axial length [5,23], axial length adjustments [24], and new generations of IOL formulas including the Barrett Universal II [25], Holladay 2, and Olsen formula [26]. Abulafia et al compared these options in eyes with axial length ≥ 26 mm and reported that all formulas and methods can achieve a high level of predictive ability with IOL power ≥ 6.0 D [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[4][5][6][7][8]10,11 Optimizing or personalizing the lens constant has been recommended by authors of several formulae to improve their accuracy and predictability. [13][14][15][16] Personalizing the lens constant can be used to make global adjustments for a variety of practice-specific variables (eg, surgical technique, variations in AL and K measurements, and so on). In fact, failure to personalize lens constants has been shown to give suboptimal refractive outcomes following cataract surgery in adult eyes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die SRK-T-Formel ist eine etablierte Methode zur Biometrie bei Patienten mit hoher Achsenmyopie und hinsichtlich refraktiver Ergebnisse der Haigis-oder Holladay-1-Formel ähnlich [11,15,18,20]. Haigis [4] hat aber kürzlich die Bedeutung unterschiedlicher A-Konstanten für Positiv-Dioptrien-und Negativ-Dioptrien-IOLs hervorgehoben.…”
Section: Diskussionunclassified