Three pigeons were studied under two-key concurrent variable-interval schedules with food as the reinforcer on one key and ectostriatal brain stimulation as the reinforcer oln the other. Brain-stimulation parameters were kept constant while the rate of food reinforcement availability was varied. The results showed that qualitatively different reinforcers could be handled in the same theoretical framework that applies when choice is between different rates, immediacies, and amounts of a single reinforcer.In the study of reinforcement it is now possible to state quantitative laws about the reinforcing properties of different rates (Herrnstein, 1961;1970), delays (Chung, 1965;Chung and Herrnstein, 1967), and magnitudes (Catania, 1963;Brownstein 1971) of a single type of reinforcer. Using concurrent variable-interval (VI) schedules, these workers have documented the following relations: if P1 and P2 are the numbers of responses per session to the keys associated with two schedules, and responses to the two keys are reinforced at different rates of reinforcement (r1 and r2), or with two different immediacies of reinforcement (reciprocal of delay, i1 and i2), or with two dif-