2008
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.10.061807.160439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intracranial and Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Similarities, Differences, and Need for a New Class of Computational Models

Abstract: Intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms result from different underlying disease processes and exhibit different rupture potentials, yet they share many histopathological and biomechanical characteristics. Moreover, as in other vascular diseases, hemodynamics and wall mechanics play important roles in the natural history and possible treatment of these two types of lesions. The goals of this review are twofold: first, to contrast the biology and mechanics of intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms to e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
237
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 265 publications
(242 citation statements)
references
References 187 publications
(184 reference statements)
1
237
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The needs he identifies are embraced by the sentence 'Because of the inherent complexities of the microstructure and biomechanical behaviour of biological cells and tissues, there is a need for new theoretical frameworks to guide the design and interpretation of new classes of experiments'. Whilst Humphrey's review covers a wide range of soft tissues, that of Humphrey & Taylor (2008) is more specific in that it compares and contrasts the biology and mechanics of intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms. They emphasize the need to couple more effectively the wall biosolid mechanics with the biofluid dynamics of blood flow, vascular biology and medical imaging in order to improve understanding of the mechanobiology and pathophysiology of aneurysms and their treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The needs he identifies are embraced by the sentence 'Because of the inherent complexities of the microstructure and biomechanical behaviour of biological cells and tissues, there is a need for new theoretical frameworks to guide the design and interpretation of new classes of experiments'. Whilst Humphrey's review covers a wide range of soft tissues, that of Humphrey & Taylor (2008) is more specific in that it compares and contrasts the biology and mechanics of intracranial and abdominal aortic aneurysms. They emphasize the need to couple more effectively the wall biosolid mechanics with the biofluid dynamics of blood flow, vascular biology and medical imaging in order to improve understanding of the mechanobiology and pathophysiology of aneurysms and their treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This leaves physicians to face the dilemma of either subjecting patients to a complex surgery with high morbidity and complications or to an unknown risk of rupture, to paraphrase Lasheras (2007). As pointed out by Humphrey & Taylor (2008) and Humphrey & Holzapfel (2012), there is a pressing need to better understand the mechanobiology, pathophysiology and treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm; an understanding that should result from combining advances in vascular biology, medical imaging, biofluid mechanics and biosolid mechanics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide a background and motivation for the present study, we briefly mention some of the recent work on the haemodynamics of abdominal aortic aneurysms; for a more elaborate discussion the reader is referred to the reviews by Lasheras (2007) and Humphrey & Taylor (2008). A highly advanced approach, which has increasingly become the standard, is the experimental and computational study of blood flow in models of the cardiovascular system obtained from patient-specific anatomical data acquired by medical imaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cerebral artery aneurysms (CAA) and abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) are the most common aneurysm types. The AAA arises in the infrarenal aorta with a diameter greater than 3 cm and can be up to 9 cm in length [1,2]. Most of the studies on aneurysms have focused on already existing realistic or idealized aneurysms [33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43] with the aim of defining a relevant rupture criterion [4,7,10,19,20,24].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the reasons of AAA formation are not yet well clarified, suggestions are either local weakening of the artery due to loss of medial elastin and then the degeneration of smooth muscle cells (SMC) or the existence of atherosclerotic plaque with ILT as an initial mechanism [1]. Researchers have considered different constitutive models for investigating inception and growth of aneurysms [45][46][47][48].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%