2017
DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2016-0264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae

Abstract: The asymmetry indexes have helped cytotaxonomists to interpret and classify plant karyotypes for species delimitation efforts. However, there is no consensus about the best method to calculate the intrachromosomal asymmetry. The present study aimed to compare different intrachromosomal asymmetry indexes in order to indicate which are more efficient for the estimation of asymmetry in different groups of orchids. Besides, we aimed to compare our results with the Orchidaceae phylogenetic proposal to test the hypo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At least five spread metaphases with clear and separate chromosomes were examined for chromosome number and karyotypic asymmetry. Karyotype features included chromosome number (2n), HCL, and Stebbins karyotype (SK) (Medeiros-Neto et al, 2017;Stebbins, 1971), and the asymmetric indexes were selected as follows: interchromosomal asymmetry indexes A 2 , intrachromosomal asymmetry indexes A 1 (Zarco, 1986), Syi (Venora et al, 2002), and asymmetry coefficient of karyotypes AsK% (Arano, 1963). The arm ratio (r = length of the long arm/length of the short arm) was used to classify the chromosomes as metacentric (m, r = 1.0 to 1.7), submetacentric (sm, r = 1.7 to 3.0), subtelocentric (st, r = 3.0 to 7.0), and asrocentric (t, r = 7.0 to 1) (Levan et al, 1964).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At least five spread metaphases with clear and separate chromosomes were examined for chromosome number and karyotypic asymmetry. Karyotype features included chromosome number (2n), HCL, and Stebbins karyotype (SK) (Medeiros-Neto et al, 2017;Stebbins, 1971), and the asymmetric indexes were selected as follows: interchromosomal asymmetry indexes A 2 , intrachromosomal asymmetry indexes A 1 (Zarco, 1986), Syi (Venora et al, 2002), and asymmetry coefficient of karyotypes AsK% (Arano, 1963). The arm ratio (r = length of the long arm/length of the short arm) was used to classify the chromosomes as metacentric (m, r = 1.0 to 1.7), submetacentric (sm, r = 1.7 to 3.0), subtelocentric (st, r = 3.0 to 7.0), and asrocentric (t, r = 7.0 to 1) (Levan et al, 1964).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ideograms were analyzed using Microsoft Office Visio. The chromosomal asymmetry index value is calculated using the formula [10]. : average of the chromosome length in a karyotype.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of these calculations explain that the A2 value is small or close to zero in both control and treatment. According to Neto et al [21], the A2 value tends to approach zero in some species of Epidendroideae and Orchidoideae subfamilies. These results indicate that the size dispersion in one karyotype is not too large or small.…”
Section: Chromosomal Asymmetry Indexmentioning
confidence: 99%