Intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection versus conventional techniques for oocyte insemination during in vitro fertilisation in couples with non-male subfertility

Re-evaluation of post-wash sperm is a helpful tool in the decision to perform in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection

“…, 2003). Several studies have reported similar fertilisation failure rates in ICSI cycles for normal sperm and also lower fertilisation and implantation rates compared to IVF (Van Rumste et al. , 2003; Kim et al.…”

Re-evaluation of post-wash sperm is a helpful tool in the decision to perform in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection

“…, 2003). Several studies have reported similar fertilisation failure rates in ICSI cycles for normal sperm and also lower fertilisation and implantation rates compared to IVF (Van Rumste et al. , 2003; Kim et al.…”

A Chinese practice guideline of the assisted reproductive technology strategies for women with advanced age

“…They concluded that compared to conventional IVF, ICSI could not improve the ART outcomes . A systematic review in 2003 (AMSTAR = 11, n = 415) showed no difference in clinical pregnancy rate between the IVF and ICSI group for women younger than 37 years old (OR = 1.44; 95% CI, 0.95‐2.21) . In terms of the safety of these two approaches, a 2012 systematic review conducted by Wen Juan et al (AMSTAR score = 6, n = 156758) showed both IVF and ICSI would increase the risk of congenital malformation comparing with spontaneous conception (RR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25‐1.47), but there is no difference between the two groups (RR = 1.05; 95％ CI, 0.91‐1.20) .…”

A brief history of technical developments in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Dedicated to the memory of J.M. Cummins

“…They concluded that the data did not support the expanded use of ICSI in ART. This was further supported by two Cochrane Reviews (van Rumste et al 2000;Lepine et al 2019) and recommended by the Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2020).…”

Re-evaluation of post-wash sperm is a helpful tool in the decision to perform in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection

“…, 2003). Several studies have reported similar fertilisation failure rates in ICSI cycles for normal sperm and also lower fertilisation and implantation rates compared to IVF (Van Rumste et al. , 2003; Kim et al.…”

A Chinese practice guideline of the assisted reproductive technology strategies for women with advanced age

“…They concluded that compared to conventional IVF, ICSI could not improve the ART outcomes . A systematic review in 2003 (AMSTAR = 11, n = 415) showed no difference in clinical pregnancy rate between the IVF and ICSI group for women younger than 37 years old (OR = 1.44; 95% CI, 0.95‐2.21) . In terms of the safety of these two approaches, a 2012 systematic review conducted by Wen Juan et al (AMSTAR score = 6, n = 156758) showed both IVF and ICSI would increase the risk of congenital malformation comparing with spontaneous conception (RR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25‐1.47), but there is no difference between the two groups (RR = 1.05; 95％ CI, 0.91‐1.20) .…”

A brief history of technical developments in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Dedicated to the memory of J.M. Cummins

“…They concluded that the data did not support the expanded use of ICSI in ART. This was further supported by two Cochrane Reviews (van Rumste et al 2000;Lepine et al 2019) and recommended by the Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2020).…”

Re-evaluation of post-wash sperm is a helpful tool in the decision to perform in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection

“…, 2003). Several studies have reported similar fertilisation failure rates in ICSI cycles for normal sperm and also lower fertilisation and implantation rates compared to IVF (Van Rumste et al. , 2003; Kim et al.…”

A Chinese practice guideline of the assisted reproductive technology strategies for women with advanced age

“…They concluded that compared to conventional IVF, ICSI could not improve the ART outcomes . A systematic review in 2003 (AMSTAR = 11, n = 415) showed no difference in clinical pregnancy rate between the IVF and ICSI group for women younger than 37 years old (OR = 1.44; 95% CI, 0.95‐2.21) . In terms of the safety of these two approaches, a 2012 systematic review conducted by Wen Juan et al (AMSTAR score = 6, n = 156758) showed both IVF and ICSI would increase the risk of congenital malformation comparing with spontaneous conception (RR = 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25‐1.47), but there is no difference between the two groups (RR = 1.05; 95％ CI, 0.91‐1.20) .…”

A brief history of technical developments in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). Dedicated to the memory of J.M. Cummins

“…They concluded that the data did not support the expanded use of ICSI in ART. This was further supported by two Cochrane Reviews (van Rumste et al 2000;Lepine et al 2019) and recommended by the Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (2020).…”