Interventions for drug-using offenders in the courts, secure establishments and the community.

Was ist wirksam in forensischer Suchtbehandlung? – Ein nicht-systematischer Einblick in die Evidenzbasierung von Behandlungsansätzen und Interventionen im Kontext des § 64 StGB

“…Ein weiteres systematisches Review aus demselben Jahr beschreibt therapeutische Gemeinschaften und Nachsorge als vielversprechendste Ansätze in der forensischen Behandlung bei Abhängigkeit von illegalen Drogen 11 . Zugleich wird in diesem Review betont, dass es keinen Goldstandard dafür gebe (es erfolgt ein Verweis auf 12 – siehe unten als aktualisierte Version). In Bezug auf alkoholbezogene Störungen wird die Evidenz zu psycho-sozial-behavioralen Interventionen als widersprüchlich beschrieben.…”

Was ist wirksam in forensischer Suchtbehandlung? – Ein nicht-systematischer Einblick in die Evidenzbasierung von Behandlungsansätzen und Interventionen im Kontext des § 64 StGB

“…Ein weiteres systematisches Review aus demselben Jahr beschreibt therapeutische Gemeinschaften und Nachsorge als vielversprechendste Ansätze in der forensischen Behandlung bei Abhängigkeit von illegalen Drogen 11 . Zugleich wird in diesem Review betont, dass es keinen Goldstandard dafür gebe (es erfolgt ein Verweis auf 12 – siehe unten als aktualisierte Version). In Bezug auf alkoholbezogene Störungen wird die Evidenz zu psycho-sozial-behavioralen Interventionen als widersprüchlich beschrieben.…”

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diversion and aftercare programmes for offenders using class A drugs: a systematic review and economic evaluation

“…A systematic review concluded that there was uncertainty about the costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions for drug-using offenders. 54,55 Furthermore, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diversion schemes to identify and refer offenders who misuse drugs for treatment is unclear. The use of the CJS as a means of referral into drug treatment has frequently been examined as a predictor of treatment success.…”

“…The partial economic evaluations [51][52][53][54][55]83,88,[96][97][98][99][100][101] were also reviewed to assess whether or not they included data to populate an economic model of the cost-effectiveness of diversion and aftercare. None of the studies included observed service use, unit cost or utility data to supplement the data sources identified for the economic model (see Chapter 5, Data sources).…”

Evaluation of the “Basic Training Course for Physicians on the Assessment and Management of Drug Dependence”, 2013-2017

“…The complexity of the condition, characterized by an uncontrollable craving and seeking for drugs and which can result to other mental, physical, and even social consequences, requires the delivery of a combination of medication and behavioral therapy tailor-fitted for each individual patient (i.e., considering the type of drug used, the duration and severity of addiction, the presence of other disease conditions, the venue or setting in which care is being provided, and the social-demographic characteristics of the drug user) (McLellan, 2017;NIDA, 2012;Perry et al, 2014;Perry, Neilson, et al, 2015a, 2015bPerry, Neilson, Martyn-St James, Glanville, Woodhouse, & Hewitt, 2015). Physicians should be at the frontline of treatment (Rapoport and Rowley, 2017).…”

Was ist wirksam in forensischer Suchtbehandlung? – Ein nicht-systematischer Einblick in die Evidenzbasierung von Behandlungsansätzen und Interventionen im Kontext des § 64 StGB

“…Ein weiteres systematisches Review aus demselben Jahr beschreibt therapeutische Gemeinschaften und Nachsorge als vielversprechendste Ansätze in der forensischen Behandlung bei Abhängigkeit von illegalen Drogen 11 . Zugleich wird in diesem Review betont, dass es keinen Goldstandard dafür gebe (es erfolgt ein Verweis auf 12 – siehe unten als aktualisierte Version). In Bezug auf alkoholbezogene Störungen wird die Evidenz zu psycho-sozial-behavioralen Interventionen als widersprüchlich beschrieben.…”

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diversion and aftercare programmes for offenders using class A drugs: a systematic review and economic evaluation

“…A systematic review concluded that there was uncertainty about the costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions for drug-using offenders. 54,55 Furthermore, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diversion schemes to identify and refer offenders who misuse drugs for treatment is unclear. The use of the CJS as a means of referral into drug treatment has frequently been examined as a predictor of treatment success.…”

“…The partial economic evaluations [51][52][53][54][55]83,88,[96][97][98][99][100][101] were also reviewed to assess whether or not they included data to populate an economic model of the cost-effectiveness of diversion and aftercare. None of the studies included observed service use, unit cost or utility data to supplement the data sources identified for the economic model (see Chapter 5, Data sources).…”

Evaluation of the “Basic Training Course for Physicians on the Assessment and Management of Drug Dependence”, 2013-2017

“…The complexity of the condition, characterized by an uncontrollable craving and seeking for drugs and which can result to other mental, physical, and even social consequences, requires the delivery of a combination of medication and behavioral therapy tailor-fitted for each individual patient (i.e., considering the type of drug used, the duration and severity of addiction, the presence of other disease conditions, the venue or setting in which care is being provided, and the social-demographic characteristics of the drug user) (McLellan, 2017;NIDA, 2012;Perry et al, 2014;Perry, Neilson, et al, 2015a, 2015bPerry, Neilson, Martyn-St James, Glanville, Woodhouse, & Hewitt, 2015). Physicians should be at the frontline of treatment (Rapoport and Rowley, 2017).…”

Was ist wirksam in forensischer Suchtbehandlung? – Ein nicht-systematischer Einblick in die Evidenzbasierung von Behandlungsansätzen und Interventionen im Kontext des § 64 StGB

“…Ein weiteres systematisches Review aus demselben Jahr beschreibt therapeutische Gemeinschaften und Nachsorge als vielversprechendste Ansätze in der forensischen Behandlung bei Abhängigkeit von illegalen Drogen 11 . Zugleich wird in diesem Review betont, dass es keinen Goldstandard dafür gebe (es erfolgt ein Verweis auf 12 – siehe unten als aktualisierte Version). In Bezug auf alkoholbezogene Störungen wird die Evidenz zu psycho-sozial-behavioralen Interventionen als widersprüchlich beschrieben.…”

The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diversion and aftercare programmes for offenders using class A drugs: a systematic review and economic evaluation

“…A systematic review concluded that there was uncertainty about the costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions for drug-using offenders. 54,55 Furthermore, the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of diversion schemes to identify and refer offenders who misuse drugs for treatment is unclear. The use of the CJS as a means of referral into drug treatment has frequently been examined as a predictor of treatment success.…”

“…The partial economic evaluations [51][52][53][54][55]83,88,[96][97][98][99][100][101] were also reviewed to assess whether or not they included data to populate an economic model of the cost-effectiveness of diversion and aftercare. None of the studies included observed service use, unit cost or utility data to supplement the data sources identified for the economic model (see Chapter 5, Data sources).…”

Evaluation of the “Basic Training Course for Physicians on the Assessment and Management of Drug Dependence”, 2013-2017

“…The complexity of the condition, characterized by an uncontrollable craving and seeking for drugs and which can result to other mental, physical, and even social consequences, requires the delivery of a combination of medication and behavioral therapy tailor-fitted for each individual patient (i.e., considering the type of drug used, the duration and severity of addiction, the presence of other disease conditions, the venue or setting in which care is being provided, and the social-demographic characteristics of the drug user) (McLellan, 2017;NIDA, 2012;Perry et al, 2014;Perry, Neilson, et al, 2015a, 2015bPerry, Neilson, Martyn-St James, Glanville, Woodhouse, & Hewitt, 2015). Physicians should be at the frontline of treatment (Rapoport and Rowley, 2017).…”