2019
DOI: 10.5294/aqui.2019.19.3.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intervention of Humanized Nursing Accompaniment and Quality of Life in People with Advanced Cancer

Abstract: Objective: To assess the effect of an intervention of humanized nursing accompaniment, at home, on the quality of life of people with advanced cancer and of their family caregivers. Method: Pre-experimental study with pre- and post-intervention measurements. The intervention included home visits, internet platform, and telephone contact for three months. The sample was comprised of 17 patient-caregiver dyads. The data analysis was descriptive and correlational. Results: The study obtained a large magnitude of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Among 27 studies,[ 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ] 7 studies[ 31 40 41 46 49 50 53 ] were pretest–posttest design. Mixed design was used in 3 studies[ 32 42 45 ] and 17[ 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 43 44 47 48 51 52 54 55 56 57 ] studies were randomized controlled trial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Among 27 studies,[ 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 ] 7 studies[ 31 40 41 46 49 50 53 ] were pretest–posttest design. Mixed design was used in 3 studies[ 32 42 45 ] and 17[ 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 43 44 47 48 51 52 54 55 56 57 ] studies were randomized controlled trial.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Almost half of the studies[ 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 41 43 47 48 51 52 53 ] were conducted in multi-sites and the remaining[ 31 32 40 42 44 45 46 49 50 54 55 56 57 ] in one site. Sample size of 3 studies[ 40 46 50 ] was less than or equal to ten dyads, while sample size was between 11 and 20 dyads in 3 studies,[ 31 56 57 ] 21 and 30 dyads in 4 studies,[ 42 45 48 49 ] 31 and 40 dyads in 5 studies[ 32 39 41 51 53 ] 41 and 50 dyads in 2 studies,[ 33 52 ] 61–70 dyads in 1 study,[ 38 ] 71 and 80 dyads in 3 studies,[ 35 36 44 ] 91 and 100 in 1 study,[ 43 ] 100 and 200 dyads in 2 studies,[ 54 55 ] 200 and 300 dyads in 2 studies,[ 34 47 ] and above 300 dyads, i.e., 302 dyads in one study. [ 37 ] Sample size calculation was shown in only four studies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations