2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80041-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersensory Redundancy Guides Early Perceptual and Cognitive Development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
178
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
14
178
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that the present study was not primarily intended as a rigorous test of competing theories (e.g., Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000, 2002Rescorla & Durlach, 1981). It is clear that there are more definitive tests of a perceptual configuration theory than postconditioning extinction of one of the nominal components of the compound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the present study was not primarily intended as a rigorous test of competing theories (e.g., Bahrick & Lickliter, 2000, 2002Rescorla & Durlach, 1981). It is clear that there are more definitive tests of a perceptual configuration theory than postconditioning extinction of one of the nominal components of the compound.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Visual and tactile exploration provides infants with the opportunity to experience the same information in more than one modality, as well as to link information from one modality to another. There is evidence that multisensory experiences lead to the formation of multimodal object representations that are more rich and robust than unimodal representations (HerndanezReif & Bahrick, 2001;Bahrick & Lickliter, 2002;Bahrick, Flom, & Lickliter, 2004;Slater, Quinn, Brown, & Hayes, 1999).…”
Section: Other Examples Of Priming In Infantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, research on speech segmentation has focused on the cues within the speech stream itself; however, even four-week-olds can direct their attention based on synchronization between sight and sound (Bahrick, 2001;Bahrick, Lickliter, & Flom, 2004). Dodd (1979) found that 10-to 16-week-olds will direct their attention to speech presented in synchrony with a dynamic video of that speaker's face compared to a video that is not synchronized (see also Lewkowicz, 1994;Pickens, Field, Nawrocki, Martinez, Soutullo, & Gonzalez, 1994).…”
Section: Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%