1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-240x(199704)20:2<169::aid-nur9>3.3.co;2-b
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Interpretive description: A noncategorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
184
30
27
5

Citation Types

1
165
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2026
2026

Publication Types

Select...
165
39
22
5

Relationship

0
231

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 230 publications

(168 citation statements)
references

References 0 publications

1
165
0
2
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These stages align with classifications of data described by Sandelowski (2003), though the final stage was most consistent with the interpretive description approach described by Thorne et al (1997Thorne et al ( , 2004). …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 70%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…These stages align with classifications of data described by Sandelowski (2003), though the final stage was most consistent with the interpretive description approach described by Thorne et al (1997Thorne et al ( , 2004). …”
Section: Discussion
supporting
confidence: 70%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…16 We used thematic analysis and an inductive approach to analyse the data, that is, the themes emerged from the available data. These methods are consistent with interpretive description, 17,18 which focuses on generating new knowledge by understanding complex experiential phenomena related to health and are similar to the pragmatic approaches used by other qualitative studies (e.g. Kolehmainen and McAnuff).…”
Section: Methods Design
mentioning
confidence: 80%
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Two interviews were coded independently by CM and KBS, who then discussed until codes were agreed upon, these were then applied to the remaining 10 interviews. Reflexive memos and linkages were generated iteratively, throughout the process to allow for synthesis and contextualization of ideas, and the theorizing about their relationships within and between participants (Thorne, Kirkham, & MacDonald-Emes, 1997). Developing concepts were discussed by the whole team throughout analysis to organize thoughts about these relationships and emerging themes.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 99%