2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-007-9634-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpreting Structural Equation Modeling Results: A Reply to Martin and Cullen

Abstract: SEM modeling, fit indices, ethical climate theory,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
57
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As is true in any statistical method, the goal of SEM models is to describe the data with as good of fit as possible. 16 Models define theoretically appropriate relationships between the measured and latent variables; "good models" are defined as explaining the variability in the data set better than when no model is defined, in other words, with no defined relationships. 17 For SEM, any proposed model must fulfill minimum requirements on several "goodness-of-fit" (GOF) statistics.…”
Section: Survey Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As is true in any statistical method, the goal of SEM models is to describe the data with as good of fit as possible. 16 Models define theoretically appropriate relationships between the measured and latent variables; "good models" are defined as explaining the variability in the data set better than when no model is defined, in other words, with no defined relationships. 17 For SEM, any proposed model must fulfill minimum requirements on several "goodness-of-fit" (GOF) statistics.…”
Section: Survey Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Essentially, all GOF measures check the SEM model versus the null hypothesis, which in this case is a model that restricts covariance of any modeled variables to be equal to the sample covariance. 16 The null hypothesis overspecifies the relationships present in the data. The main GOF statistic is the likelihood ratio chi-squared (χ 2 ), which measures the cumulative difference between variance predicted by the model and that predicted by the null hypothesis.…”
Section: Survey Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CMIN/df (i.e., chi-square statistic divided by the model degrees of freedom) was used to measure the fit of the model to the data. Acceptable values are considered to be as close to 1 as possible [20]. TLI (i.e., Tucker-Lewis index) values approaching 1; and CFI (i.e., confirmatory fit index) values of greater than 0.95 were utilized to test the model to baseline comparisons based on established guidelines [20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, RMSEA (i.e., root mean squared error of approximation) was used to approximate model error. A value of less than 0.05 was used based on established guidelines [20]. Table 2 illustrates differences between females in the analytic sample and those who did not meet our inclusion criteria.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%