2016
DOI: 10.1080/10256016.2016.1142987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interpretation of anthropogenic impacts (agriculture and urbanization) on tropical deltaic river network through the spatio-temporal variation of stable (N, O) isotopes of NO3

Abstract: For the first time, the dual isotope approach was applied to trace the sources of impacts and to identify the governing biogeochemical processes in a river network in the tropical deltaic region of the Red River (Vietnam). Our long term surveys concluded that water in this river network was severely impacted by anthropogenic activities. Analysis has shown strong spatio-temporal variation of nitrate isotopes; ranges of δ(15)N-[Formula: see text] and δ(18)O-[Formula: see text] were from -5 to 15 ‰ and from -10 t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are, on the other hand, some distinctive differences between the DRB and eutrophic river systems elsewhere in the world. For instance, compared to other studies (Battaglin et al, 2001, Chen et al, 2009, Lin et al, 2019, the present study (building on earlier work of Ta et al, 2016) is among the few reporting 15 N-NO3 values < 0 (Popescu et al, 2015;Vrzel et al, 2016). A rational explanation is that urea characterized with depleted 15 N is extensively used in the DRB and agriculture is the dominant source of NO3 in many parts of this system.…”
Section: Agricultural Practices and Their Impacts On Riverine No3 In The Drbmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…There are, on the other hand, some distinctive differences between the DRB and eutrophic river systems elsewhere in the world. For instance, compared to other studies (Battaglin et al, 2001, Chen et al, 2009, Lin et al, 2019, the present study (building on earlier work of Ta et al, 2016) is among the few reporting 15 N-NO3 values < 0 (Popescu et al, 2015;Vrzel et al, 2016). A rational explanation is that urea characterized with depleted 15 N is extensively used in the DRB and agriculture is the dominant source of NO3 in many parts of this system.…”
Section: Agricultural Practices and Their Impacts On Riverine No3 In The Drbmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…10 m from river banks and divided into sub-samples for analysis of N nutrient concentrations, Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC), and stable isotope analyses. These parameters were chosen as it is acknowledged that to assess the sources of NO3 and to identify the governing processes of NO3 in stream water, stable isotopes of water (δ 18 O-H2O), N species and carbon availability (represented as DOC) should also be analysed (Baker and Vervier, 2004;Zarnetske et al, 2011;Ta et al, 2016).…”
Section: Sampling and Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations