2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interplay between Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay and DNA Damage Response Pathways Reveals that Stn1 and Ten1 Are the Key CST Telomere-Cap Components

Abstract: SummaryA large and diverse set of proteins, including CST complex, nonsense mediated decay (NMD), and DNA damage response (DDR) proteins, play important roles at the telomere in mammals and yeast. Here, we report that NMD, like the DDR, affects single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) production at uncapped telomeres. Remarkably, we find that the requirement for Cdc13, one of the components of CST, can be efficiently bypassed when aspects of DDR and NMD pathways are inactivated. However, identical genetic interventions do … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Competition model fitness rankings of deletions on P15 are similar to the published logistic model rankings from Addinall et al (2011) for the fastest and slowest growing strains ( Figure 10). Both models also agree with rankings from independent spot tests for these strains (Maringele and Lydall, 2002;Zubko et al, 2004;Holstein et al, 2014;Foster et al, 2006). Middle rankings, however, disagree between models, and Spearman's Rho between M DR estimates is just 0.635.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Competition model fitness rankings of deletions on P15 are similar to the published logistic model rankings from Addinall et al (2011) for the fastest and slowest growing strains ( Figure 10). Both models also agree with rankings from independent spot tests for these strains (Maringele and Lydall, 2002;Zubko et al, 2004;Holstein et al, 2014;Foster et al, 2006). Middle rankings, however, disagree between models, and Spearman's Rho between M DR estimates is just 0.635.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Repeats of each strain increase statistical power. Furthermore, for several strains, independent spot tests have been published and may be used for validation (Maringele and Lydall, 2002;Zubko et al, 2004;Holstein et al, 2014;Foster et al, 2006).…”
Section: The P15 Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, yeast Stn1 inhibits telomerase binding to Cdc13 (Chandra et al, 2001), arguing that CST components must be modified in some fashion for replication, perhaps via phosphorylation of Cdc13 (Li et al, 2009) and Stn1 (Liu et al, 2014). In some genetic backgrounds, STN1 and TEN1 stabilize chromosome ends in a Cdc13-independent manner (Holstein et al, 2014;Petreaca et al, 2006). Moreover, relative to human cells deficient in STN1 or CTC1, cells lacking TEN1 exhibit more severe growth defects, a higher frequency of chromosomes lacking telomeric DNA, and more anaphase bridges (Kasbek et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rif1∆, made cells considerably sicker in the rad9∆ cdc13-1 (UD) context. Conversely, the nmd∆ mutations improved rad9∆ cdc13-1 (UD) fitness more than cdc13-1 (UD) fitness, suggesting that NMD has stronger effects on ssDNA accumulation in the absence or Rad9 (Holstein et al, 2014). It was notable that mutations affecting the checkpoint sliding clamp (ddc1∆, rad24∆ and rad17∆) clustered very tightly in Figure 3B.…”
Section: Acute Exposure To Telomere Defectsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…cdc13-1 strains are comparatively viable in small scale up-down assays and the effect of nmd2∆ correlates with lower levels of ssDNA production at defective telomeres in nmd2∆ mutants (Holstein et al, 2014).…”
Section: Effects Of Different Gene Deletions Across Several Telomere mentioning
confidence: 99%