2000
DOI: 10.1037/0735-7028.31.5.569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internship accessibility issues for deaf and hard-of-hearing applications: No cause for complacency.

Abstract: What are Che experiences of Deaf and hard-of-hearing students in applying for predoclora! internships in professional psychology? Are internship programs aware of accessibility issues in regard to these applicants? Federal laws, accreditation guidelines of the American Psychological Association, and rules of the Association of Psychology Postdoctoral and Internship Centers require that internship training programs provide access for interns with disabilities. Compliance with these requirements is still evolvin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such language may bias diagnostic and intervention processes (Simeonsson & Scarborough, 2001), Language may reveal our attitudes toward people with disabilities (Häuser, Maxwell-McCaw, Leigh, & Gutman, 2000), Excessively positive language (e,g,, "heroic," "despite his disability," or references to "overcoming disability") or excessively negative language (e,g,, "afflicted with," "suffering from," or "confined to a wheelchair") regarding people with disabilities focuses on stereotypes, rather than individuals (Katz, Hass, & Bailey, 1988), People-first language (e,g,, "a woman with multiple sclerosis," "a student who is depressed") is typically used to maximize focus on the person (APA, 2010), However, other individuals prefer disability-first language (National Federation of the Blind, 1993;Sinclair, 2007), It is important to avoid stereotypical or derogatory phrases that imply deficiency or inadequacy such as "deaf mute" since a deaf person is perfectly capable of intelligent communication (Gill et al,, 2003;Khubchandani, 2001;Olkin, 2002), Even though we assume that communication is mostly verbal (i,e,, spoken, signed, and written language), approximately 70%-80% of communication is nonverbal, including facial and body language, personal mannerisms, and style-anything that adds meaning to a message (Mehrabian, 1968a(Mehrabian, , 1968b, As such, it is a powerful tool for shaping the context of the client-psychologist dialogue, A psychologist who responds appropriately validates the client and minimizes possible bias and misperception about the client's disability (Khubchandani, 2001;Kosciulek, 1999;Olkin, 1999b), Examples of appropriate responses include sustaining eye contact with a client who uses a sign language interpreter to communicate, rather than shifting to the interpreter. You may also ask if a client who has a disability needs assistance with a task, but do not volunteer to help without permission.…”
Section: Guideline 4 Psychologists Strive To Learn About Federal Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such language may bias diagnostic and intervention processes (Simeonsson & Scarborough, 2001), Language may reveal our attitudes toward people with disabilities (Häuser, Maxwell-McCaw, Leigh, & Gutman, 2000), Excessively positive language (e,g,, "heroic," "despite his disability," or references to "overcoming disability") or excessively negative language (e,g,, "afflicted with," "suffering from," or "confined to a wheelchair") regarding people with disabilities focuses on stereotypes, rather than individuals (Katz, Hass, & Bailey, 1988), People-first language (e,g,, "a woman with multiple sclerosis," "a student who is depressed") is typically used to maximize focus on the person (APA, 2010), However, other individuals prefer disability-first language (National Federation of the Blind, 1993;Sinclair, 2007), It is important to avoid stereotypical or derogatory phrases that imply deficiency or inadequacy such as "deaf mute" since a deaf person is perfectly capable of intelligent communication (Gill et al,, 2003;Khubchandani, 2001;Olkin, 2002), Even though we assume that communication is mostly verbal (i,e,, spoken, signed, and written language), approximately 70%-80% of communication is nonverbal, including facial and body language, personal mannerisms, and style-anything that adds meaning to a message (Mehrabian, 1968a(Mehrabian, , 1968b, As such, it is a powerful tool for shaping the context of the client-psychologist dialogue, A psychologist who responds appropriately validates the client and minimizes possible bias and misperception about the client's disability (Khubchandani, 2001;Kosciulek, 1999;Olkin, 1999b), Examples of appropriate responses include sustaining eye contact with a client who uses a sign language interpreter to communicate, rather than shifting to the interpreter. You may also ask if a client who has a disability needs assistance with a task, but do not volunteer to help without permission.…”
Section: Guideline 4 Psychologists Strive To Learn About Federal Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Informed choices are, however, more likely to produce the most beneficial results for the school and the student. ( ¶ 67) Hauser et al (2000) suggest two practices for success in this situation:…”
Section: Creating and Providing Appropriate Internship Experiencesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These directors welcomed greater access to internships for students with disabilities but have concerns about costs and competence (Hauser et al, 2000).…”
Section: Students With Disabilities In the College Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…WHEREAS persons with disabilities are often denied access to services, and are denied appropriate accommodations and resources to fully participate in education and training programs, employment, and the political process (e.g., Hauser, Maxwell-McCaw, Leigh, & Gutman, 2000;Roessler, & Sumner, 1997);…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%