2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.avb.2021.101608
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internet, social media and online hate speech. Systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
53
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Rather than online behavior that is labeled as antisocial being limited to a small, vocal group of provocateurs, recent research has reported that standard OSN users can be provoked into becoming trolls or engaging in other antisocial behavior, influenced by the user's mood and the context of the discussion [315]. Similarly, communications labeled as hate speech can be triggered in users by their OSN community members' behaviors [316,317] as well as being more likely when specific topics are discussed [318,319]. Such research suggests that at least a subset of OSN users perceived as malevolent might become more positive contributors to OSNs by the thoughtful shaping of online environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather than online behavior that is labeled as antisocial being limited to a small, vocal group of provocateurs, recent research has reported that standard OSN users can be provoked into becoming trolls or engaging in other antisocial behavior, influenced by the user's mood and the context of the discussion [315]. Similarly, communications labeled as hate speech can be triggered in users by their OSN community members' behaviors [316,317] as well as being more likely when specific topics are discussed [318,319]. Such research suggests that at least a subset of OSN users perceived as malevolent might become more positive contributors to OSNs by the thoughtful shaping of online environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The task-specific part acts as a single-sentence classifier on each dataset to classify their samples. The classifier is a fully connected layer followed by a softmax to estimate the probability of a sentence's contextual representation vector, which is labeled as class c as shown in Equation (1). The cross-entropy loss over the softmax output is used in our experiment to train the MTL model on both binary and multi-class classifications.…”
Section: Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cambridge Dictionary (https://dictionary.cambridge.org/fr/ (accessed on 10 May 2021)) defines hate speech as "public speech that expresses hate or encourages violence towards a person or group based on something such as race, religion, sex or sexual orientation". Online hate speech is characterized as the use of an offensive language, aimed at a specific group of people who share some common trait [1], while social networks have been recognized as a very favorable medium often used for planning and executing hate attack related activities [2]. Beyond the psychological harm, such toxic online content may be influencing and radicalizing individuals and could lead to actual hate crimes [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The online hate against women tends to use shaming. [...] flaming, trolling, hostility, obscenity, high incidence of insults, aggressive lexis, suspicion, demasculinization, and dehumanization can inflict harm" [51]. This information could be exploited to verify the diversity and representativeness of the samples collected in a dataset.…”
Section: Introduction Of Biasesmentioning
confidence: 99%